Fill Out Your Army Oer Support Da 67 9 1 Form

Filling out the Army OER Support DA 67 9 1 form requires careful attention to detail. One common mistake is failing to provide complete identification details. All sections, including the name, SSN, rank, date of rank, and unit information, must be filled out accurately. Missing or incorrect information can delay processing and affect evaluations.

Another mistake frequently seen is inadequate participation in the mandatory face-to-face discussion. The form requires the rater and rated officer to conduct an initial counseling session on duties and responsibilities. If this session does not take place, or if it is poorly documented, it undermines the entire assessment process. Properly recording the date and initials of all parties involved is essential.

Additionally, people often struggle to articulate their significant contributions effectively. In Part V of the form, individuals should list their achievements in a clear and concise manner. Vague statements can dilute the impact of accomplishments. Highlighting specific examples not only strengthens the report but also showcases professional value to the Army.

Lastly, neglecting to consider future assignments can be detrimental. When filling out preferences for future roles, be thoughtful about potential matches with skills and career aspirations. This section should reflect well-considered choices that align with both personal goals and the Army's needs. Taking the time to thoughtfully complete each section will lead to a more favorable evaluation.

The Army Officer Evaluation Report Support Form, also known as DA Form 67-9-1, is an essential document in the performance evaluation process for military officers. Alongside this form, several other documents come into play to provide a comprehensive overview of an officer's capabilities and contributions. Each document serves a unique purpose, ensuring a thorough evaluation process that considers different aspects of an officer's performance and potential. Below is a list of commonly used forms and documents that complement the DA Form 67-9-1.

• DA Form 67-9: This is the official Officer Evaluation Report itself, serving as the primary record of an officer’s performance over a specific period. It outlines accomplishments, strengths, and areas for improvement as assessed by the rater and senior rater.
• DA Form 4856: This is the Developmental Counseling Form where rater and rated officer discuss objectives, feedback on performance, and developmental needs throughout the rating cycle. It serves to document face-to-face discussions and is a crucial tool for personal and professional growth.
• DA Form 1059: Used for recording academic achievements, this form provides a summary of an officer's training and education experiences. It is important for career progression and assessments related to skill development.
• NCOER Support Form (DA Form 2166-9-1): While specific to Non-Commissioned Officers, this form supports their evaluation and provides an overview of duties and performance objectives, similar to the officer support form.
• DA Form 3508: Also known as the United States Army Officer Evaluation Report Assignment History, this form outlines the officer's previous assignments and experiences, highlighting their career progression and development over time.
• Commander’s Assessment: Often a narrative by the officer's commanding officer, this assessment reflects on the officer's leadership, effectiveness, and impact on unit readiness. It complements other evaluation tools by providing insights from a higher command perspective.
• Professional Development Form: This document captures an officer's individual development plans and goals, informing raters about areas where the officer aims to grow and improve, thereby influencing their evaluation.
• DA Form 3328: This form records the officer's civilian education and professional certifications, ensuring that a complete view of the officer's qualifications and expertise is presented in their evaluation.
• Continuous Feedback Tool: Often a digital platform, this tool allows for ongoing feedback between raters and rated officers throughout the year. It emphasizes a culture of open communication and support in performance development.
• Self-Assessment Worksheet: This worksheet allows officers to reflect on their performance, providing a structured way to articulate their contributions and achievements ahead of the evaluation process.

Utilizing these documents in conjunction with the Army Officer Evaluation Report Support Form streamlines the evaluation process and ensures it is reflective of the officer’s abilities and potential. Armed with these tools, both officers and their evaluators can engage in meaningful discussions about performance, development, and future assignments, ultimately enhancing the effectiveness of the Army as a whole.

• DA Form 67-9: This is the official Officer Evaluation Report (OER) and serves as the primary document for assessing an officer's performance. Similar to the DA 67-9-1, it includes evaluations from the rater and senior rater, highlights accomplishments, and captures future potential.

• DA Form 1059: This form is used for documenting the evaluation of an officer in a training environment. Like the DA 67-9-1, it records performance and provides feedback on objectives, although it focuses specifically on training achievements and competencies.

• DA Form 2166-9: This non-commissioned officer evaluation report (NCOER) is designed for evaluating NCOs. Similar in structure, it includes input from raters and a self-assessment component, ensuring comprehensive feedback on the NCO's responsibilities and accomplishments.

• DA Form 601-270: This is a request for personnel action and is similar in that it is used for documenting important personnel changes. While it doesn’t evaluate performance, it does capture significant professional information, such as assignments and qualifications, aligning with the supportive role of the DA 67-9-1.

When filling out the Army Officer Evaluation Report Support Form (DA 67-9-1), it is important to adhere to specific best practices and avoid common mistakes. The following list outlines four key dos and don'ts.

• Do: Ensure all personal information is accurate and complete, including name, SSN, and rank.
• Do: Maintain clear and concise language when stating significant duties and responsibilities.
• Don't: Use vague language. Be specific about performance objectives and contributions.
• Don't: Forget to document face-to-face counseling dates and signatures, as required.

There are several misconceptions about the Army OER Support DA 67-9-1 form that can lead to confusion. Understanding these misconceptions can help ensure that the form is used correctly and effectively. Here are seven common misunderstandings:

1. The form is optional. Many believe that the DA 67-9-1 form is not required. However, it is actually a mandatory component of the Officer Evaluation Report process.
2. It only needs to be completed at the end of the rating period. Some assume that the form is only filled out at the end of a rating period. In reality, it should be updated throughout the year, including during face-to-face counseling sessions.
3. Only the rated officer is responsible for its completion. It's a common misconception that only the officer being rated must complete this form. In fact, both the rated officer and the raters share responsibility in providing accurate and timely information.
4. Submission may happen without a review. Some think that the DA 67-9-1 can be submitted without any oversight. However, the form requires signatures and reviews by the rater and senior rater to ensure accuracy and completeness.
5. All contributions need to be listed in extreme detail. Many feel pressured to provide exhaustive descriptions of all their contributions. However, it is more effective to highlight significant achievements and skills rather than exhaustive lists.
6. Only performance objectives matter. There is a belief that only objectives carry weight in evaluations. While performance objectives are crucial, personal contributions and professional growth also play an important role.
7. The form does not affect career progression. Some individuals mistakenly believe that the DA 67-9-1 form does not influence promotions or career opportunities. In fact, the information reported here can significantly impact an officer's career path.

By clearing up these misconceptions, officers can better navigate their evaluations and make the most of their opportunities for professional development.

Filling out the Army Officer Evaluation Report Support Form (DA 67-9-1) is an essential process for members of the Army. Here are key takeaways to consider:

• Ensure all personal information is accurate. This includes the rated officer’s name, social security number, rank, and branch.
• Complete Part II with the names and ranks of the rater, intermediate rater, and senior rater to authenticate the evaluation process.
• Conduct mandatory initial face-to-face counseling with the rater. This step is crucial for discussing duties and performance objectives.
• Document follow-up counseling sessions. Record the dates and initials of all parties involved to ensure accountability.
• In Part IV, clearly outline your significant duties and responsibilities. Use specific language to describe your contributions effectively.
• Set measurable performance objectives. This helps clarify expectations and provides targets for evaluation.
• In Part V, highlight your significant contributions and unique skills. This information is essential for demonstrating value to the Army.
• Consider your preferences for branch or career field changes. Clearly state your desires if you wish to explore different opportunities.
• List future assignments that align with your skills. This shows foresight and ambition, contributing positively to your evaluation.

Following these points can help ensure that the DA 67-9-1 form serves its purpose effectively.