Fill Out Your Da 1059 Form

Filling out the DA 1059 form can be a straightforward task, but several common mistakes often occur. One frequent error is providing inaccurate personal information. This includes misspelled names, incorrect Social Security numbers, and wrong course titles. Precision matters. Double-check these details to avoid complications down the line.

Another mistake is neglecting the completion of all the required sections. Some individuals skip parts they believe are less important, like the performance summary or leadership skills evaluation. Every section serves a purpose in assessing academic progress. It is essential to fill out the form completely.

Inadequate explanations in comments can lead to misunderstandings. For example, ratings that receive a "superior" or "unsatisfactory" mark must include supportive comments in Item 14. Without this clarity, the evaluation loses its constructive essence.

Many people also forget to review the document for grammatical errors or unclear language. Clarity in written communication reflects a conscientious approach. Submit the form without errors to convey professionalism and attention to detail.

Failing to obtain proper authentication is another significant oversight. Ensure that all required signatures are present, including the rater, reviewing officer, and the rated soldier. A missing signature can render the form invalid, delaying the evaluation process.

Individuals often misjudge the importance of demonstrating academic potential for further training. Marking "no" without adequate justification may raise concerns. If a "no" is indicated, include detailed comments to explain this assessment thoroughly.

Sometimes, candidates assume that oral communication will automatically be rated without noting it properly. Every evaluation needs explicit mention. If oral communication has not been evaluated, this should be clearly indicated.

Many fail to accurately reflect the duration of the course in the date fields. Both the start and end dates impact the evaluation context. Incorrect dates can lead to significant discrepancies, influencing future training opportunities.

Finally, a common error is to overlook submission timelines. Timeliness in submission of the DA 1059 is critical. Late submissions can affect evaluations and hinder potential career advancements.

The DA Form 1059, known as the Service School Academic Evaluation Report, is essential for evaluating a soldier's performance in military training. When completing this form, other documents may also be required to support academic evaluations and provide additional context regarding a soldier's training and performance.

• DA Form 1059-1: This form is used for the Academic Evaluation Report for Non-Resident Training Programs. It offers a similar function as the DA Form 1059 but is specifically designed for courses that do not require residence attendance.
• DA Form 100: This form is the Core Army Training and Certification Tracking System (ATCTS) Record. It documents training accomplishments and can support the DA Form 1059 by providing evidence of completed training and certification.
• DA Form 2-1: This form serves as a Personnel Qualification Record. It lists a soldier's qualifications and can complement the academic evaluation by showing the soldier's overall career progression and skill sets.
• DA Form 4187: This is the Personnel Action Form. It is used to initiate various personnel actions, such as reassignments or promotions, and can provide context on a soldier's future assignments, which may be relevant in evaluating their academic performance.

Gathering and submitting these documents alongside the DA Form 1059 ensures a comprehensive evaluation of a soldier's training and capabilities. This holistic approach aids in making informed decisions regarding future assignments and training opportunities.

The DA Form 1059 is an important document within the military that serves as an Academic Evaluation Report. It captures vital performance metrics for soldiers attending service schools. Similar forms fulfill comparable functions in different contexts or similar assessments. Here’s a look at seven documents that share commonalities with the DA Form 1059:

• DA Form 67-9 - This form is used for Officer Evaluation Reports, providing a comprehensive overview of an officer's performance and potential for promotions. Like the DA Form 1059, it assesses abilities across multiple dimensions and serves as a basis for future career decisions.
• Evaluation Report (NCOER) - The Noncommissioned Officer Evaluation Report evaluates the performance of NCOs. Similar to the DA 1059, it includes ratings on various competencies and contributes to soldiers' career progression and development opportunities.
• FITREP - The Fitness Report is utilized in the Navy to assess performance. It reflects overall achievements in areas such as leadership, duty performance, and more, similar to how the DA 1059 delineates a soldier's academic capabilities.
• OER - The Officer Evaluation Record expands on officer performance and is a key reference for promotions. The feedback provided in each evaluation helps frame an officer's trajectory, much like academic evaluations do for enlisted personnel.
• TRADOC Form 350-18-2-R-E - This form is used within the Army Training and Doctrine Command to evaluate course graduates. It offers insights on how well a soldier met educational standards, paralleling the DA 1059's evaluation of academic performance.
• DA Form 1058 - The DA 1058 is used for describing a soldier's qualification for training programs and tracks their readiness. Similar to the DA 1059, it provides an assessment that can impact a soldier's future opportunities.
• PDG 623-3 - This document outlines policies and procedures for performance evaluations. While it doesn't serve as an evaluation itself, it guides the creation of others, including the DA 1059, ensuring consistency and fairness across all assessments.

These documents play critical roles in the evaluation processes within the military. Each one serves to inform future assignments, promotions, and training opportunities through structured assessments of performance and potential.

When filling out the DA 1059 form, it’s essential to be careful and thorough. Here is a list of things you should and shouldn't do when completing this important document.

• Do ensure all personal information is correct. Double-check names, Social Security Number (SSN), and course details.
• Do provide specific comments in Item 14, especially if ratings are "superior" or "unsat." This is vital for clarity.
• Do communicate any issues in performance clearly. If there are concerns, they should be addressed in the evaluation.
• Do have the proper authorities sign and date the form. All signatures must be present for the report to be valid.
• Don't leave any required fields blank. Incomplete information can lead to delays or issues with the report.
• Don't use vague language. Be precise and clear in your evaluations to avoid misunderstandings.

Completing the DA 1059 form accurately reflects the student's performance and potential. Taking the time to follow these guidelines will help ensure that the evaluation serves its intended purpose effectively.

Below are some common misconceptions about the DA Form 1059:

• The DA Form 1059 is only for military personnel. This form is primarily used within the military for academic evaluations, but some civilian roles in defense-related positions may also utilize it.
• It is a permanent record. While the DA Form 1059 serves as an important evaluation, it is not the sole document in a service member’s permanent file. Other forms and evaluations also contribute to a complete record.
• Only poor performance gets noted. This form evaluates positive aspects of a soldier's performance as well as areas needing improvement. Recognizing strengths is just as important.
• You can skip comments. Comments are crucial, especially if a "Superiority" or "Unsatisfactory" rating is given. Raters must support their evaluations with specific feedback.
• It is valid for any course. The DA Form 1059 is designed for specific service school courses. Using it for other training may not be appropriate.
• Completion is optional. If a soldier is evaluated during training, completion of the DA Form 1059 is typically required to document their academic progress.
• The course duration must always be one year. The duration of the course can vary greatly and is specified in the form as needed, making flexibility a key feature.
• It is filled out only by the instructor. While instructors complete the form, rated soldiers must also sign it, indicating their acknowledgment of the evaluation.
• The DA Form 1059 affects pay grade. The form itself does not directly impact a soldier's pay grade but may influence their eligibility for future opportunities based on performance.
• Once signed, it cannot be challenged. Soldiers have the right to address inaccuracies or provide feedback regarding their evaluations even after the form is completed.

The DA 1059 form, known as the Service School Academic Evaluation Report, is critical for evaluating service members' performance in academic courses. Below are key points to keep in mind when filling out and using this form:

• Accurate Information: Ensure all personal details, such as name and Social Security Number, are correctly entered in the specified fields.
• Performance Summary: Evaluate the student’s performance across various categories, including written and oral communication and leadership skills.
• Supported Ratings: Any ratings of "Superior" or "Unsat" must be adequately justified in the comments section. This is essential for transparency.
• Academic Potential: Assess if the student demonstrates the potential for further education. This must be recorded and justified if rated as "No."
• Authentication Process: Ensure the completed form is signed and dated by both the rater and the reviewing officer to validate the evaluation.
• Referral Comments: If the report is referred, indicate if comments are required. This allows for additional context regarding the evaluation.
• Deadlines: Be mindful of any submission deadlines for the evaluation to ensure it is processed in a timely manner.