Fill Out Your Cd 516 Lf Form
The CD-516 LF form is an important document used within the U.S. Department of Commerce, specifically designed for performance management in government roles. It includes various sections that capture key information related to an employee’s job responsibilities, performance expectations, and evaluations. The form is divided into parts that address position descriptions, performance plans, progress reviews, and performance certification. Each section is carefully structured to ensure that both employees and supervisors understand their roles and responsibilities. For instance, there is a requirement for position certification, where supervisors attest to the accuracy of position descriptions. Additionally, critical elements of performance are outlined, helping to set clear benchmarks for evaluation. The progress review area provides space for supervisors to give feedback and track employee performance throughout the year. Moreover, the form acknowledges the importance of employee input, as it includes a section for employees to sign, indicating they have discussed their performance plans with their supervisors. Overall, the CD-516 LF form serves as a comprehensive tool to facilitate effective performance management, ensuring accountability and clarity within government employment. It addresses both the employee’s contributions and the supervisory assessments that play a vital role in career development and management within federal agencies.
Cd 516 Lf Example
FORM |
|
|
US DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE |
|
|
|
NEW |
|||
|
|
CLASSIFICATION AND |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I/A: |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT RECORD |
|
MR#: |
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
IP#: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance Plan |
|
Performance Appraisal Performance Recognition |
Progress Review |
Position Description |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee’s Name: VACANCY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Position Title: FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT ANALYST |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pay Plan, Series, Grade/Step: ZA/0501/ IV |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Organization: |
1. |
NOAA |
4. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. PPBS |
5. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. |
|
|
6. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rating Period: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Covered by |
|
|
Senior Executive Service |
|
Demonstration Project |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
X |
|
General Workforce |
|
Other: |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
PART A - POSITION DESCRIPTION |
|
|
|
||||
POSITION CERTIFICATION – I certify that this is an accurate statement of the major duties and responsibilities of the position and its organization relationships and that the position is necessary to carry out Government functions for which I am responsible. This certification is made with the knowledge that this information is to be used for statutory purpose relating to appointment and payment of public funds and that false or misleading statements may constitute violation of such statute or their implementing regulations.
SUPERVISOR’S SIGNATURE |
|
DATE |
|
SECOND LEVEL SUPERVISOR |
DATE |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jane Doe |
|
|
|
|
John Smith |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CLASSIFICATION |
OFFICIAL TITLE: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
CERTIFICATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PP: |
SERIES: |
FUNC: |
|
GRADE: |
I/A: |
|
YES |
|
NO |
||
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I certify that this position has been classified as required by Title 5, US Code, in conformance with standards published by the OPM or, if no published standard applies directly, consistently with the most applicable published standards.
NAME & TITLE OF CLASSIFIER |
|
SIGNATURE |
DATE |
|
|
|
|
Jane Doe, Branch Chief |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART B - PERFORMANCE PLAN |
|
|
This plan is an accurate statement of the work that will be the basis of the employee’s performance appraisal.
NAME & TITLE OF FIRST LINE SUPERVISOR/RATING OFFICIAL |
SIGNATURE |
DATE |
|
|
|
John Smith, Director |
|
|
|
|
|
APPROVAL – I agree with the certification of the position description and approve the performance plan. |
|
|
|
|
|
NAME & TITLE OF APPROVING OFFICIAL OR SES APPOINTING AUTHORITY |
SIGNATURE |
DATE |
|
|
|
John ABC |
|
|
|
|
|
EMPLOYEE ACKNOWLEDGMENT – My signature acknowledges |
SIGNATURE |
DATE |
discussion of the position description and receipt of the plan, and does not |
|
|
|
|
|
necessarily signify agreement. |
|
|
|
|
|
PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT – Disclosure of your social security number on this form is voluntary. The number is linked with your name in the official personnel records system to ensure unique identification of your records. The social security number will be used solely to ensure accurate entry of your performance rating into the automated record system.
MS Word Version, NOAA Performance Management Forms, 6/29/04:
PERFORMANCE PLAN, PROGRESS |
|
Employee’s Name: |
|
|
REVIEW and APPRAISAL RECORD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART I. PERFORMANCE PLAN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. CRITICAL ELEMENTS (LIST AT LEAST TWO BUT NO MORE THAN FIVE) |
|
B. RATING |
||
( Expand size of blocks as desired) |
|
(Mark One) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
|
|
Meets |
Does |
|
|
|
or |
Not |
|
|
|
Exceeds |
Meet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. |
|
|
Meets |
Does |
|
|
|
or |
Not |
|
|
|
Exceeds |
Meet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. |
|
|
Meets |
Does |
|
|
|
or |
Not |
|
|
|
Exceeds |
Meet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. |
|
|
Meets |
Does |
|
|
|
or |
Not |
|
|
|
Exceeds |
Meet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. |
|
|
Meets |
Does |
|
|
|
or |
Not |
|
|
|
Exceeds |
Meet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOAA |
See NAO |
|||
PART II. PROGRESS REVIEW COMMENTS
Date(s) of review and initials of employee and rating official must be provided for each review. A summary
of comments is optional unless expectations are not being met.
Employee |
Date: |
Rating Official |
Comments |
Yes |
No |
Initials: |
|
Initials: |
Attached: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee |
Date: |
Rating Official |
Comments |
Yes |
No |
Initials: |
|
Initials: |
Attached: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee |
Date: |
Rating Official |
Comments |
Yes |
No |
Initials: |
|
Initials: |
Attached: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee |
Date: |
Rating Official |
Comments |
Yes |
No |
Initials: |
|
Initials: |
Attached: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART III. SUMMARY LEVEL
NOTE:If any one or more of the Critical Elements in Part I above is marked “Does Not Meet” Expectations,
the below Summary of Expectations must also be marked “Does Not Meet.” Also, a written explanation must be attached.*
Summary
MEETS
OR
EXCEEDS
DOES
NOT
MEET *
Mark one of the following
Check under “Yes” column if: |
YES |
1.Written comments or explanations are attached.*
2.A Quality Step Increase is recommended (narrative justification attached)
PART IV. PERFORMANCE CERTIFICATION
(Employee’s signature certifies review and discussion with the Rating Official.
It does not necessarily mean that the employee concurs with the information on this form.)
Rating Official Signature: |
Date: |
|
|
Reviewing Official Signature: |
Date: |
(If Applicable) |
|
|
|
Employee Signature: |
Date: |
|
|
NOAA |
See NAO |
Appendix B
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
|
For each Performance Indicator listed below, circle the number of each Critical Element (from Part I) that |
Applicable |
|
||||
|
is applicable, in the right column: |
|
Critical |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
||||
|
I. QUALITY |
|
|
||||
|
Elements |
|
|||||
|
A. Knowledge of Field or Profession: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maintains and demonstrates technical competence and/or experience in areas of assigned responsibility. |
All |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Accuracy and Thoroughness of Work: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plans, organizes, and executes work logically. Anticipates and analyzes problems clearly and determines appropriate |
All |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
solutions. Work is correct and complete. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Soundness of Judgment and Decisions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Documents assignments carefully. Weighs alternative courses of action, considering long- and |
All |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
Makes and executes timely decisions. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Effectiveness of Written Decisions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Presentation meets objectives, is persuasive, tactful, and appropriate to audience. Demonstrates attention, courtesy and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
respect for other points of view. |
All 1 2 3 4 |
5 |
||||
|
|
|
|
||||
|
E. Timeliness in Meeting Deadlines. : Completes work in accordance with established deadlines |
All 1 2 3 4 |
5 |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Use of Information Technology: |
All |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
Work effectively uses IT resources and follows applicable IT policies and procedures including both security and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
appropriate use policies. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Other (Specify): |
All |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
II. TEAMWORK
A. Participation: |
Willingly participates in group activities, performing in a thorough and complete fashion. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Communicates regularly with team members. Seeks team consensus. |
|
All |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Cooperation: |
Supports team initiatives. Demonstrates respect for team members. Seeks team consensus. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Leadership: |
Provides encouragement, guidance, and direction to team members as needed. |
Adjusts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
leadership style to fit situation. |
|
All |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Safety: |
Maintains a safe work environment, including keeping the work area free of known hazards. |
All |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
|
Complies with all occupational safety rules and regulations and encourages safe behavior in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fellow workers. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Other (Specify): |
|
|
All |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
III. CUSTOMER SERVICE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Quality of Service: |
Delivers high quality products and services to both external and internal customers Initiates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and responds to suggestions for improving service. |
|
All |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Timeliness of Service: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delivers quality products and services in accordance with time schedules agreed upon with |
All |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
|
customer. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Courtesy: |
Treats external and internal customers with courtesy and respect. Customer satisfaction is |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
high priority. |
|
All |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Other (Specify): |
|
|
All |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
|
|
||||||
NOAA |
See NAO |
|||||||
Attachment
(Due December 1 of each year)
TO: Director for Human Resources Management
FROM: |
Assistant Administrator |
|
Program Director |
|
Staff Office Director |
SUBJECT: |
Annual Certification of Compliance with |
|
Performance Management Responsibilities |
I certify that all employees within the Line/Staff/Program Office have received performance appraisals for the rating cycle ending September 30.
Not Rated. The following employees were not rated:
Organization Code Employee Names Reason for No Appraisal
Extensions. The following employees did not complete the minimum 120 days work under a performance plan to be rated as of September 30th. They will complete 120 days under their current performance standards and will be rated on the date shown:
Organization Code Employee Names Scheduled Date of 120 Day Rating
Unratables. The following employees cannot be rated for the reason shown (such as: time in a
Organization Code Employee Names |
Reason for No Rating |
New Plan Certification. I also certify that all employees within the Line/Staff/Program Office who are in covered positions and are not exceptions as noted above, have received performance plans for the new appraisal cycle. This includes employees on
Form Characteristics
| Fact Name | Description |
|---|---|
| Form Purpose | This form tracks the performance management of federal employees, ensuring compliance with government standards. |
| Governing Law | The form is aligned with Title 5 of the United States Code, which governs federal personnel management. |
| Parts of the Form | The form is divided into four main parts: Position Description, Performance Plan, Progress Review, and Performance Certification. |
| Certification Requirement | Supervisors must certify that position descriptions accurately represent employee duties and responsibilities. |
| Employee Acknowledgment | Employees confirm their understanding of the position description and performance plan by signing the form. |
| Privacy Statement | Disclosure
Guidelines on Utilizing Cd 516 LfCompleting the CD 516 LF form is an essential process that involves documenting the performance management details related to specific government positions. The following steps will guide you through the filling out of the form, ensuring that all necessary information is accurately reported and certified.
What You Should Know About This FormWhat is the purpose of Form CD-516 LF? Form CD-516 LF is used by the U.S. Department of Commerce, specifically within the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), primarily to document various aspects of employee performance management. It includes sections for performance plans, appraisals, and recognition, ensuring that clear expectations are set and documented for the employee’s performance during the rating period. Who is required to complete the CD-516 LF form? This form must be completed by supervisors and management personnel for employees covered under NOAA’s performance management system. It applies to various positions, including those in the Senior Executive Service or General Workforce. The formalization of employee roles and performance expectations is critical to maintaining accountability and ensuring effective evaluations. What information is included in the position description section of the form? The position description section includes details such as the employee’s name, title, pay plan, organization, and a certification statement. Supervisors confirm the accuracy of the duties and responsibilities, signifying that the position is essential for government operations. This is crucial for both transparency and proper classification under federal regulations. How are performance plans created in this form? Performance plans are developed collaboratively between the employee and their first-line supervisor or rating official. The form highlights critical elements that define expected performance levels, ensuring the employee is aware of how their work will be judged during evaluations. The approval of these plans indicates agreement on the performance expectations set forth. What should be done if an employee does not meet performance expectations? If any critical element indicates that an employee does not meet expectations, a written explanation must accompany the evaluation. This summary is essential to provide clarity on areas that require improvement. Supervisors should address these issues directly, offering guidance on how to enhance performance moving forward. Is the employee's signature on the form an agreement with the performance appraisal? No, the employee's signature serves merely as an acknowledgment of having discussed the position description and having received the performance plan. It does not necessarily indicate the employee’s agreement with the content. This distinction is important to maintain a record of communication while allowing room for differing perspectives. Are there confidentiality measures regarding personal information on the form? Yes, the form includes a Privacy Act Statement, indicating that disclosing personal information, such as social security numbers, is voluntary. Such information is used solely for the purpose of ensuring accurate performance ratings within personnel records. This commitment to privacy is crucial for protecting employee information in compliance with federal regulations. How often is the CD-516 LF form utilized? This form is typically utilized at least once per rating cycle, which generally corresponds to annual performance evaluations. Depending on internal processes and policies, progress reviews may occur at other intervals throughout the year. Regular use of the form fosters ongoing communication and alignment between employees and supervisors. What actions must be taken if an employee does not receive a performance appraisal? If an employee does not receive a performance appraisal by the specified date, the responsible management should document the reasons for the lack of appraisal. Possible reasons may include the employee's extended absence or insufficient work duration under the current performance standards. Taking proactive steps ensures compliance with federal performance management responsibilities. Common mistakesFilling out the CD-516 LF form can be straightforward, but mistakes commonly occur. One frequent error is not signing the necessary sections. Each required signature signifies acknowledgment and approval of various components of the performance management process. Without these signatures, the form may be considered incomplete, causing delays in processing. Another mistake is overlooking details in the position description section. The certification states that the position description is accurate. Failing to provide a comprehensive and correct position description can lead to misunderstandings about job responsibilities and expectations. Ensure that all major duties are detailed accurately. It's also important to be thorough when listing performance expectations. Many people mistakenly mark fewer than the required two critical elements in Part I. Only providing one may indicate incomplete evaluations and misrepresent performance standards. Aim for clarity and meet the minimum requirements. A common oversight involves forgetting to include the dates and initials during progress reviews. Each review period needs to be documented clearly. Lack of information in this section can hinder assessing employees' progress effectively. Always ensure that all dates and initials are filled in properly. Failing to attach necessary comments or explanations is another error. If any critical element is rated “Does Not Meet,” it’s crucial to provide context and justification. Without supporting comments, ratings can appear unjustified, which can adversely affect employee evaluations. Another pitfall is neglecting to check the accuracy of the ratings marked in the performance plan. Mistakes in ratings can misrepresent an employee's performance level and lead to misunderstandings down the line. Carefully review each rating to ensure consistency with established standards. Individuals can also forget to verify their information when filling out their social security number. While the disclosure is voluntary, it's essential to provide the correct number if you choose to include it. Incorrect information could disrupt your records and cause identification issues in personnel systems. Finally, not reviewing the entire document before submission is a common mistake. A final review helps catch any overlooked fields or errors. Take the time to go through the form to ensure that all information is complete, accurate, and aligned with your organization’s requirements. Documents used along the formThe CD 516 LF form is a critical document used in performance management systems within the US Department of Commerce. Various other forms and documents often accompany it to ensure a comprehensive evaluation process. These documents help outline expectations, assess progress, and standardize the performance review cycle. Below is a list of some commonly used forms that work alongside the CD 516 LF.
Understanding these documents is vital for both employees and supervisors within the public sector. They collectively ensure a fair and transparent performance evaluation process, aiding in employee development and enhancing organizational effectiveness. Being familiar with each form can empower individuals to engage more fully in their performance management journey. Similar formsThe CD 516 LF form is an important document related to performance management in the government sector. Understanding other documents that are similar can provide valuable context. Here are four documents that share similarities with the CD 516 LF form:
Dos and Don'tsWhen completing the CD-516 LF form, there are specific actions to take and avoid for accurate submissions. The following list outlines what to do and what not to do.
Misconceptions
Key takeawaysFilling out and using the CD-516 LF form effectively is essential for performance management within the Department of Commerce. Here are some key takeaways to consider:
Utilizing these takeaways can lead to a more effective performance management process, ensuring clarity and integrity in evaluations. Browse Other TemplatesSeterus Mortgage Login - The packet guarantees that every aspect of the household income and expenditures is accounted for. Ulm Transcript Request - Review the finished form before submitting to ensure all information is provided accurately. 60th Wedding Anniversary Card From King - Celebrating a life filled with cherished moments at 100 years old. |