Homepage Fill Out Your Mmpi 2 Score Interpretation Form
Article Structure

The MMPI-2 Score Interpretation form is an essential tool in psychological assessment, providing a comprehensive framework for understanding the results of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2). This form encompasses various aspects, including administration guidelines, scoring procedures, and interpretation methods for a wide range of scales. Effective administration allows clients to answer questions at their own pace, while ensuring clarity in instructions. The scoring process requires careful verification to confirm all items are addressed, enhancing the reliability of results. Each scale within the MMPI-2 generates T-scores, which denote how an individual's responses compare to normative data. The form emphasizes the importance of validity checks, particularly concerning unanswered items or inconsistent responses, which can affect the interpretation of results. Various scales, such as the L Scale and F Scale, focus on different dimensions of personality traits and psychopathology. For instance, the L Scale assesses defensiveness and self-presentation tendencies, while the F Scale evaluates symptom exaggeration. Other scales delve into specific psychological concerns, like Hypochondriasis, measuring an individual's preoccupation with health. By systematically analyzing these scores and their implications, professionals can gain valuable insights into a person's psychological state, guiding treatment and intervention strategies.

Mmpi 2 Score Interpretation Example

THE MMPI-2

I.MMPI-2

A.Administration

1)give the booklet to the client and read the instructions to him/her

2)if the protocol is to be computer scored, be sure the client completely fills in the dots

a.not so much of a consideration if you are hand-scoring (which we are because we are not rich enough to computer score the protocols)

3)client doesn’t have to complete the MMPI in 1 setting; they can take their time to complete it

4)it can be given in a group or individual format

5)items can be read or delivered via tape recorder

6)if the client cannot decide whether an item is true or false, tell him/her to choose what it is

MOST OF THE TIME

a.if they persist, I usually tell them to decide what it is 51% of the time

B.Scoring

1)make sure the client has answered all the questions

a.when you get the protocol back, just scan it to make sure nothing was omitted. If you find some, have them re-do the questions

2)then, put the scoring templates over the answer protocol and count the dots that appear in the windows

a.be sure to double check your counting

b.also double check the placement of the scoring template to be sure that it is in the correct position

IV. Interpretation of the MMPI-2

A. Scales give results in T-Scores

1)M of 50; SD of 10

B. Check the validity of the test administration

1)Cannot Say Scale (?)

a.items left unanswered or double answered

b.1-2 are normal

c.Interpret with caution any protocol with 10 or more Cannot Say items

d.Do not interpret any protocols with more than 30 Cannot Say items

1.you can go back and encourage your client to complete the items

e.Hypotheses for elevated scores

1.Defensiveness

2.Indecisiveness

3.Fatigue, low mood

4.Carelessness

5.Low reading skill

6.Perceived irrelevance of items

f.If the Cannot Say items fall primarily after item 370, you can interpret the Validity and Basic Scales, but not the Supplementary and Harris-Lingoes

2)L Scale

a.this scale attempts to detect a deliberate and unsophisticated attempt of the client to present himself/herself in a favorable light

b.15 rationally-derived items deal with minor flaws and weaknesses most people are willing to admit

1. Examples:

29. At times I feel like swearing. (F)

 

51. I do not read every editorial in the newspaper every day. (F)

c. scores are negatively related to educational level, socioeconomic level, and

psychological sophistication

T-Score > 65 = an overly virtuous presentation

T-Score 60-64 = an attempt to impress

d.T-Scores < 65 are indicative of individuals who:

1.trying to create favorable impression of themselves by not being totally honest

2.may be defensive, denying, and repressing

3.may be confused

4.may be self-controlled and manifests little or no insight into their motivations

5.show little awareness of consequences to other people resulting from their behavior

6.tend to overvalue their own worth

7.tend to be conventional and socially conforming

8.are unoriginal in thinking and inflexible in problem solving

9.are rigid and moralistic

10.have poor tolerance for stress and pressure

11.may be unsophisticated and are trying to make a favorable impression

12.profiles with T-Scores > 65 should not be interpreted as they are invalid

e.T-Scores between 56-64 are indicative of individuals who:

1.are more conforming than usual

2.have a tendency to resort to denial mechanisms

f.Normal Range: T45-55

g.T-Scores < 45 are indicative of individuals who:

1.probably responded frankly to the items

2.are confident enough about themselves to be able to admit minor faults

3.in some cases, may be exaggerating negative characteristics

4.are perceptive and socially reliant

5.are seen as strong and relaxed

6.are self-reliant and independent

7.can function effectively in leadership roles

8.communicate ideas effectively

9.may be described by others as cynical and sarcastic

h.caveat: ministers sometimes will have elevated L Scales because they truly do not do the behaviors

3)Infrequency Scale (F)

a.60 items reflecting infrequently endorsed items

1. Examples:

36. I have a cough most of the time. (T)

78.I am liked by most people who know me. (F)

b.a measure of symptom exaggeration

1.faking bad

c.T-Scores > 100 are indicative of individuals who:

1.may have responded randomly to MMPI-2 items

2.may have responded either all True or all False

3.may have been faking bad responses

4.if hospitalized psychiatric patients, may manifest:

a)delusions

b)visual and/or auditory hallucinations

c)reduced speech

d)withdrawal

e)poor judgment

f)short attention span

g)lack of knowledge of reasons for hospitalization

h)psychotic diagnosis

i)some other signs of organicity

d.T-Scores 80-99 are indicative of individuals who:

1.may be malingering

2.may be exaggerating symptoms and problems as a plea for help

3.may be quite resistant to the testing procedure

4.may be clearly psychotic by the usual criteria

e.T-Scores 65-79 are indicative of individuals who:

1.may have very deviant social, political, or religious convictions

2.may manifest clinically severe neurotic or psychotic disorders

3.if relatively free of psychopathology, are usually described as:

a)moody

b)restless

c)dissatisfied

d)changeable, unstable

e)curious, complex

f)opinionated

g)opportunistic

4.have endorsed items relevant to some particular problem area

5.typically function adequately in most aspects of their life situations

f.Low scores on the F Scale (T < 50) are indicative of individuals who:

1.answered items as most normal people do

2.are likely to be free of disabling psychopathology

3.are socially conforming

4.may have faked good

g.T-Scores > 100 are generally invalid, but some profiles of psychiatric patients and recently admitted felons can be interpreted if VRIN is in the valid range

4)Infrequency Back (Fb)

a.assesses the endorsement of low frequency items on the latter part of the MMPI-2

b.measures the same constructs as the F Scale

c.T-Scores > 110

1.indicate an invalid protocol, especially if F Scale is > 110

d.T-Scores < 89

1.if F Scale T-Score is < 89, indicate a valid approach to the test

2.if F Scale T-Score is > 89, do not interpret Content or Harris-Lingoes Scales

e.Use the hypotheses for the F Scale when considering reasons for elevated scores, but also consider:

1.a recording error

2.client is responding randomly to items

3.client is exaggerating existing symptoms

4.client is faking a psychological problem

5.client is malingering

6.client has severe psychopathology

7.client was tired of the test

5)K Scale

a.measures of test defensiveness

b.assesses the willingness of the client to disclose personal information and to discuss his/her problems

1. Examples:

83. I have very few quarrels with members of my family. (T)

110.Most people will use somewhat unfair means to gain profit or an advantage rather than to lose it. (F)

c.K score is used to adjust Hs, Pd, Pt, Sc, and Ma Scales

d.T-Scores > 65 are indicative of individuals who:

1.may have responded false to most of the items

2.may have tried to fake good

3.may be trying to give an appearance of adequacy, control, and effectiveness

4.are shy and inhibited

5.are hesitant about becoming emotionally involved with people

6.are intolerant and unaccepting of unconventional attitudes and beliefs in

others

7.lack insight and self-understanding

8.are not likely to display overt delinquent behavior

9.if clinical scales are also elevated, may be seriously disturbed psychologically but have no awareness of it

10.if not seriously disturbed psychologically, may have above-average ego strength and other positive characteristics

e.T-Scores 56-64 are indicative of individuals who:

1.are being defensive and unwilling to acknowledge psychological distress

2.may exhibit denial and hysteroid defenses (especially in lower SES)

f.T-Scores 41-55 are indicative of individuals who:

1.maintain a healthy balance between positive self-evaluation and self-criticism

2.are psychologically well-adjusted

3.show few overt signs of emotional disturbance

4.are independent and self-reliant

5.are capable of dealing with problems in day-to-day life

6.exhibit wide interests

7.are ingenious, enterprising, versatile, and resourceful

8.are clear thinking and approach problems in reasonable and systematic ways

9.are good mixers socially

10.are enthusiastic and verbally fluent

11.take ascendant roles in relationships

g.T-Scores 35-40 are indicative of individuals who:

1.are experiencing severe distress that is being openly acknowledged

2.have poor self-concepts and are strongly self-dissatisfied, but lack either interpersonal skills or techniques necessary to alter the situation

3.may tend to be excessively open and revealing

4.in lower SES, may indicate a moderate disturbance

5.in higher SES, indicates more serious distress

f. T-Scores < 35 are indicative of persons who:

1.may have responded true to most of the items

2.may have faked bad

3.may be exaggerating problems as a cry for help

4.may exhibit acute psychotic or organic confusion

5.are critical of self and others and are dissatisfied with the self

6.are ineffective in dealing with problems of daily life

7.show little insight into their own motives and behaviors

8.are socially conforming

9.are overly compliant with authority

10.have a slow personal tempo

11.are inhibited, retiring, and shallow

12.are socially awkward

13.are blunt and harsh in social situations

14.are cynical, skeptical, caustic, and disbelieving

15.are suspicious about the motivations of others

6)F-K Index

a.F-K index is usually used to detect malingering, but the data do not necessarily support its use

1.consistently is the weakest predictor of malingering

2.continues to be used probably due to clinical folklore

b.F-K > 9 suggests an invalid protocol due to symptom exaggeration (faking bad)

c.F-K < -9 suggests an invalid protocol due to symptom minimization/ defensive responding (faking good)

d.some folks argue that you need to use a higher cutoff for a forensic population (e.g., 15

&-15 rather than 9 & -9)

e. others split the difference and go with 12

1.I argue that a conservative approach would be to use 12 as the cutoff

e.F-K Index may not be valid with the MMPI-2 (and some authors argue that you should not use it with the MMPI-2)

1.because the F scale was decreased by 4 points and the K scale remained the same

7)Item Response Inconsistency Scales: TRIN and VRIN

a.each of these scales suggests that the client is not consistent in his/her answers or approach to the test

b.TRIN

1.is sensitive to people who have a tendency to answer either true or false without careful consideration of how the question was asked

2.T-Score > 80

a)indicates an inconsistent responding to the items

b)client has a tendency to respond either true or false when pressed

c)the scale allows you to check the direction of the responses

3.T-Score 70-79

a)is suspect and suggests a response set

4.a high K Scale T-Score with a high Basic Scale T-Score and a low Raw TRIN score can be an indication that:

a)client was mostly answering false on the test

b)may not be psychopathology; just answering false

c.VRIN

1.reflects a general tendency to disregard item content in the answers

2.T-Scores > 80 indicate:

a)inconsistent random responding; invalid protocol

3.T-Scores 70-79 indicate:

a)possible invalid protocol due to inconsistent responding

C. Scale 1: Hypochondriasis (Hs)

1)32 items which focus on bodily concerns with a physiological basis or individuals who exaggerate bodily concerns

a. Examples:

53. Parts of my body often have feelings like burning, tingling,

 

crawling, or like “going to sleep.” (T)

255.I do not often notice my ears ringing or buzzing. (F)

2)developed on a group of neurotic patients who showed an excessive concern about their health, presented a variety of somatic complaints with little or no organic basis, and rejected repeated assurances that there was nothing physically wrong with them

3)has no associated Harris-Lingoes Scales

4)T-Scores > 65 (marked elevation) are indicative of individuals who:

a.have excessive bodily concerns

b.may have conversion disorder or somatic delusions

1.especially if T > 80

c.describe somatic complaints that generally are vague

1.if the somatic complaints are specific, they tend to be epigastric in nature

d.complain of chronic weakness, lack of energy, and sleep disturbance

e.if medical patients, they may have a strong psychological component to their illness

f.are likely to be diagnosed as having somatoform, somatoform pain, depressive, or anxiety disorders

g.are not likely to act out in psychopathic ways

h.seem selfish, self-centered, and narcissistic

i.Have a pessimistic, defeatist, and cynical outlook toward life

j.are unhappy and dissatisfied

k.make others miserable

l.complain

m. communicate in a whiny manner n. are demanding and critical of others o. express hostility indirectly

p. are described as dull, unenthusiastic, and unambitious q. lack ease in oral expression

r. generally do not exhibit much manifest anxiety

s. seem to have functioned at a reduced level of efficiency for long periods of time t. see themselves as medically ill and seek medical treatment

u. lack insight and resist psychological interpretations

v. are not very good candidates for psychotherapy or counseling w. become critical of their therapist

x. terminate therapy prematurely when the therapist suggests psychological reasons for symptoms or when the therapists are perceived as not giving enough attention and support

5)T-Scores 58-64 (moderate elevation) are indicative of individuals who:

a.have some concern about bodily functioning

b.are likely to be seen as immature, stubborn, and lacking drive

c.scores in the lower end of this range are typical for individuals with physical handicaps and individuals with actual physical disease

6)Normal range T-Scores 40-57

7)T-Scores < 40 (low scores) are indicative of individuals who:

a.are free of somatic preoccupation

b.are alert, sensitive, and insightful

c.are generally effective in their daily lives

d.scores in this range are typical of individuals in helping professions D. Scale 2: Depression (D)

1)57 items reflecting the feelings of discouragement, pessimism, and hopelessness, as well as the personality features of hyper-responsibility,

high personal standards, and intrapunitiveness

a. Examples:

127. Criticism or scolding hurts me terribly. (T)

117.I have never vomited blood or coughed up blood. (T)

142.I have never had a fit or convulsion. (F)

2)scale developed on psychiatric patients with various forms of symptomatic depression

3)Harris-Lingoes Scales:

a.subjective depression

b.psychomotor retardation

c.physical malfunctioning

d.mental dullness

e.brooding

4)T-Scores > 65 (marked elevation) are indicative of individuals who:

a.display depressive symptoms

1.especially if T-Score > 70

b.feel blue, unhappy, and dysphoric

c.are quite pessimistic about the future

d.have self-deprecatory and guilt feelings

e.may cry, refuse to speak, and show psychomotor retardation

f.often are given depressive diagnoses

g.report bad dreams, physical complaints, fatigue, weakness, and loss of energy

h.are agitated and tense

i.Are described as irritable, high-strung, and prone to worry and fretting

j.lack self-confidence

k.feel useless and unable to function

l. give up easily

m. feel like failures in school and work

n. have lifestyles characterized by withdrawal and lack of involvement with other people

o. are introverted, shy, retiring, timid, seclusive, and secretive p. are aloof and maintain psychological distance from others q. have a restricted range of interests

r. withdraw from activities in which they previously participated s. are very cautious and conventional

t. have difficulty making decisions

u. feel overwhelmed when faced with major life decisions v. are overcontrolled and deny their own impulses

w. avoid unpleasantness and make concessions to avoid confrontations x. because of high personal distress, are likely to be good candidates for

psychotherapy and counseling

y. may terminate therapy when the immediate crisis is over

5)T-Scores 58-64 (moderate elevation) are indicative of individuals who:

a.are dissatisfied with something or with themselves but may not recognize this state as depression

i. mild degree of depression may not appropriately represent the situation

b.may not be overly concerned about what is happening to them

c.may have learned to adjust to a chronically depressed existence

6)Normal range: T-Score 40-57

7)T-Scores < 40 (low scores) are indicative of individuals who:

a.do not experience much tension, anxiety, guilt, or depression

b.feel relaxed and at ease

c.are self-confident

d.are emotionally stable and capable of effective functioning in most situations

e.feel cheerful and optimistic

f.have little difficulty in verbal expression

g.are alert, active, and energetic

h.are competitive and seek out additional responsibilities

i.Are at ease in social situations

j.seek out leadership roles

k.create favorable first impressions

l.are seen as clever, witty, and colorful

m.may be impulsive and undercontrolled

n.are show-offish and exhibitionistic

o.may arouse hostility and resentment in other people E. Scale 3: Hysteria (Hy)

1)60 items some of which reflect physical complaints and troubling disorders

and others which reflect denial of problems and a lack of social anxiety

a. Examples: 44. Once a week or oftener I suddenly feel hot all over, for no reason.

(T)

176.I have very few headaches. (F)

2)scale constructed on patients who exhibited some form of sensory or organic motor disorder for which no organic basis could be established.

3)Harris-Lingoes Scales:

a.denial of social anxiety

b.need for affection

c.lassitude-malaise

d.somatic complaints

e. inhibition of aggression

4)T-Scores > 65 (marked elevation) are indicative of individuals who:

a.react to stress and avoid responsibility through the development of physical symptoms

b.may report headaches, stomach discomfort, chest pains, weakness, and tachycardia

c.have symptoms that may appear and disappear suddenly

d.do not report severe emotional turmoil

e.rarely report hallucinations, delusions, or suspiciousness

f.lack insight concerning causes of symptoms

g.lack insight about their own motives and feelings

h.are psychologically immature, childish, and infantile

i.if psychiatric patients, receive diagnoses of conversion disorder or psychogenic pain disorder

j.are self-centered, narcissistic, and egocentric

k.expect a great deal of attention and affection from others

l.use indirect and devious means to get attention and affection

m.do not express resentment and hostility openly

n.tend to be emotionally involved, friendly, talkative, and alert

o.have superficial and immature interpersonal relationships

p.are interested in what other people can do for them

q.occasionally act out in a sexual or aggressive manner with little apparent insight into their actions

r.initially are enthusiastic about treatment

s.view themselves as having medical problems and want medical treatment

t.are resistant to psychological interpretations

u.are likely to terminate treatment if their therapists insist on examining psychological causes of symptoms

v.may be willing to talk about psychological problems as long as they are not conceptualized as causing their symptoms

w.often respond well to direct advice and suggestion

x.when involved in therapy, often discuss worry about failure at work and school, marital unhappiness, lack of acceptance, and problems with authority figures

y.have histories of rejecting fathers

5)T-Scores 58-64 (moderate elevation) are indicative of individuals who:

a.are likely to be exhibitionistic, extroverted, and superficial

b.are naive, self-centered, and deny any problems

c.they prefer to look on the optimistic side of life and avoid any unpleasant issues

6)Normal range: T-Scores 40-57

7)T-Scores < 40 (low scores) are indicative of individuals who:

a.do not worry excessively about their health

b.do not present somatic symptoms

c.are constricted, conventional, and conforming

d.are described as unadventurous, lacking industrialness, and having a narrow range of interests

e.are cold and aloof

f.may display blunted affects

g.have limited social interests and participation

h.avoid leadership responsibilities

i.are seen as unfriendly, tough-minded, and hard to get to know

j.are suspicious and have difficulties trusting others

k.are realistic, logical, and level-headed in approach to problems

l. are not likely to make impulsive decisions

m. seem to be content with dull, uneventful life-styles

F. Scale 4: Psychopathic Deviate (Pd)

1) 50 items which assess a lack of concern about most social and moral

standards of conduct

 

a. Examples

54. My family does not like the work I have chosen (or the work I intend

 

to choose for my life work). (T)

79.I do not mind being made fun of. (F)

2)scale developed on individuals who were referred to a psychiatric service for a clarification of why they had recurring troubles with the law even though they suffered no cultural deprivation and despite their possessing normal intelligence and freedom from other psychological disorders

a.tried to get at the Conduct Disorder/Antisocial Personality Disorder folks

b.not too sure they made it

1.standardization with gangs?

3)Harris-Lingoes Subscales

a.familial discord

b.authority problems

c.social impurturbability

d.social alienation

e.self-alienation

4)T-Scores > 65 are indicative of persons who:

a.have difficulty incorporating values and standards of society into their lives

b.may engage in social and antisocial acts, including lying, cheating, stealing, sexual acting out, excessive use of alcohol and/or drugs

1.especially if T-Score > 75

c.are rebellious toward authority figures

d.have stormy relationships with their families

e.blame family members for their difficulties

f.have histories of underachievement

g.tend to experience marital problems

h.are impulsive and strive for immediate gratification of impulses

i.do not plan their behavior well

j.tend to act without considering the consequences of their actions

k.are impatient; have limited frustration tolerance

l.show poor judgment; take risks

m.tend not to learn from experience

n.are seen by others as immature and childish

o.are narcissistic, self-centered, selfish, and egocentric

p.are ostentatious and exhibitionistic

q.are insensitive to the needs and feelings of others

r.are interested in others only in terms of how they can be used

s.are likable and create good first impressions

t.have shallow and superficial relationships

u.seem unable to form warm attachments with others

v.are extroverted and outgoing

w.are talkative, active, adventurous, energetic, and spontaneous

x.are judged by others to be intelligent and self-confident

y.have a wide range of interests but lack a clear direction

z.tend to be hostile, aggressive, resentful, rebellious, antagonistic, and refractory

aa. have sarcastic and cynical attitudes

ab. may act in aggressive ways

ac. if female, may expression aggression in more passive, indirect ways ad. may feign guilt and remorse when in trouble

ae. are not seen as overwhelmed by emotional turmoil

af. may admit feeling sad, fearful, and worried abou the future ag. experience absence of deep emotional response

ah. feel empty and bored

ai. if psychiatric patients, are likely to receive antisocial or passive- aggressive personality disorder diagnoses

aj. have poor prognosis for psychotherapy or counseling

ak. may agree to treatment to avoid something more unpleasant al. tend to terminate therapy prematurely

am. in treatment, tend to intellectualize excessively and to blame others for their difficulties

5)T-Scores 58-64 (moderate elevation) are indicative of individuals who:

a.may be genuinely concerned about social problems and issues

b.may be responding to situational conflicts

c.may have adjusted to a habitual level of interpersonal and social conflict

i.if the conflict is situational, the score should return to normal levels once the conflict is resolved

6)Normal range: T-Scores 40-57

7)T-Scores < 40 are indicative of individuals who:

a.tend to be conventional, conforming, and accepting of authority

b.are passive, submissive, and unassertive

c.are concerned about how others will react to them

d.tend to be sincere and trusting in relationships

e.have a low level of drive

f.are concerned about status and security but tend not to be competitive

g.have a narrow range of interests

h.are not creative or spontaneous in their approach to problems

i.are persistent in problem solving

j.are moralistic and rigid in their views

k.if males, may not have much sex drive

l.are self-critical and dissatisfied with self

m.accept advice and suggestions

n.may become overly dependent on treatment

o.seem to be afraid to accept responsibility for their own behavior G. Scale 5: Masculinity-Femininity (Mf)

1)50 items which were intended as a measure of gender role development, including emotional reactions, interests, attitudes and feelings in which men and women differ

a.did not make it

b.tends to measure androgyny, which also correlates with SES

c. Examples (male):

74. I would like to be a florist. (T)

 

103.

I enjoy a race or a game more when I bet on it. (F)

d.(female):

112.

I like dramatics (T)

120.I frequently find it necessary to stand up for what I think is right. (F)

2)scale constructed on men who sought psychiatric help to control their homoerotic feelings and to cope with problems of gender confusion

a. originally intended to be able to determine homosexuality (before it was thrown out as a diagnostic category)

1.doesn’t work

3)No Harris-Lingoes

Form Characteristics

Fact Name Description
Administration Guidelines The MMPI-2 can be administered in both group and individual settings. It allows clients to complete the assessment at their own pace, enhancing comfort and accuracy.
Scoring Process After collecting the protocol, ensure all questions were answered. A double-check is necessary to confirm accuracy in both placement of scoring templates and counting dots in windows.
Validity Considerations Protocols with over 30 unanswered items, noted as 'Cannot Say,' should not be interpreted. A high number of such items can indicate issues with the client’s efforts or comprehension.
L Scale Interpretation This scale assesses the tendency to present oneself in a favorable light. A T-Score above 65 suggests an overly virtuous presentation, rather than an honest account of weaknesses.
Infrequency Scale Insights The Infrequency Scale (F) helps identify symptom exaggeration. T-Scores above 100 often signify invalid responses, such as randomly answering True or False.
K Scale Assessment The K Scale evaluates how defensively a client presents themselves. Higher scores suggest an intent to appear more competent or less distressed than is true.

Guidelines on Utilizing Mmpi 2 Score Interpretation

Preparing the MMPI-2 Score Interpretation form involves several distinct steps. Ensuring that attention to detail is prioritized will contribute to accurate results. Following through with each of the steps outlined will facilitate a comprehensive score interpretation and provide meaningful insights into the client's psychological profile.

  1. Provide the MMPI-2 booklet to the client and read the instructions clearly.
  2. Ensure that the client completely fills in the dots on the answer protocol, especially if scoring by computer.
  3. Inform the client they can take their time to complete the MMPI-2; it's not necessary to finish in one sitting.
  4. Conduct the assessment in either a group or individual setting, as appropriate.
  5. Offer to read items aloud or use a tape recorder for clients who may need it.
  6. Instruct clients to choose what they feel is true most of the time if they are uncertain about an item. If confusion continues, suggest they decide based on what they feel is true 51% of the time.
  7. After collecting the answered protocol, review it to confirm that all questions have been addressed. If any answers are missing, kindly ask the client to complete those sections again.
  8. Align the scoring template with the answer protocol, and tally the dots that correspond to the windows on the template.
  9. Verify your counting, ensuring accuracy in both the counting of dots and the placement of the scoring template.
  10. Check the validity of the test administration by noting the number of 'Cannot Say' responses and interpreting these scores cautiously based on the outlined criteria.
  11. Assess all relevant scales, including L, F, Fb, K, and the Infrequency and Item Response Inconsistency Scales, using the guidelines provided to evaluate T-Scores and their implications.
  12. Document interpretations of the scales clearly, making sure to note any special considerations such as the client's potential defensiveness, exaggeration, or consistency in responses.
  13. Conclude the scoring and interpretation by summarizing findings that provide insight into the client's psychological state and behaviors based on the scores achieved.

What You Should Know About This Form

What is the MMPI-2 Score Interpretation form?

The MMPI-2 Score Interpretation form is a tool used to understand the results of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) assessment. It helps clinicians analyze a client's responses to identify mental health issues, personal strengths, and potential areas of concern. This form includes guidelines for administering the test, scoring the responses, and interpreting various scales and scores.

How should the MMPI-2 be administered to a client?

To administer the MMPI-2, begin by giving the questionnaire booklet to the client. Read the instructions aloud to ensure clarity. Clients may take their time completing the questionnaire; they are not required to finish in one sitting. It can be administered individually or in a group setting, and the items can also be read aloud or provided via tape recorder. If a client struggles with true or false answers, encourage them to select what feels most accurate most of the time.

What should be checked during the scoring process?

After administering the MMPI-2, examine the client's responses to confirm that all questions have been answered. A simple scan of the filled protocol can help identify any omissions. If any questions were left unanswered, the client should complete those before scoring. When counting the responses, always double-check to ensure accuracy in both counting and the placing of the scoring templates.

What are T-scores, and how do they relate to MMPI-2 interpretation?

T-scores are standard scores used to interpret the results of the MMPI-2. In this context, a mean score of 50 with a standard deviation of 10 indicates where a client's scores fall in relation to a normative population. For example, a T-score above 65 typically suggests an area of significant concern, while scores between 45-55 are considered normal.

What does the Cannot Say Scale indicate in the MMPI-2 results?

The Cannot Say Scale reflects items that have been left unanswered or double answered. A small number of unanswered items (1-2) is normal, but a higher count (10 or more) should be interpreted with caution. If more than 30 items are unanswered, the results should not be interpreted at all. Encouraging the client to complete these items can help produce a more valid interpretation.

What is the Infrequency Scale (F) used for?

The Infrequency Scale consists of items that are less commonly endorsed and serves as a measure of symptom exaggeration or "faking bad" responses. High T-scores on this scale may indicate random responses or symptom exaggeration. For example, T-scores above 100 suggest significant concerns and might point towards potential psychotic or severe psychological issues.

How does the K Scale influence the interpretation of results?

The K Scale assesses defensiveness and the willingness of clients to disclose their issues. Elevated K scores (T-scores above 65) may indicate a tendency to present oneself in an overly positive light, while lower scores suggest a healthy balance in self-evaluation. Clinicians often use the K scale results to adjust other clinical scales for a more accurate interpretation.

What are the implications of elevated scores in the Hypochondriasis scale (Hs)?

Elevated scores on the Hypochondriasis scale often indicate excessive bodily concerns without a clear physical basis. Individuals with T-scores above 65 may exhibit vague somatic complaints and can be diagnosed with various mental health conditions, including anxiety and somatoform disorders. Understanding these scores helps clinicians address underlying psychological factors influencing physical health.

Why is it essential to validate scores using scales like the F-K Index?

The F-K Index helps detect potential malingering or disingenuous responses. High F-K scores suggest an invalid protocol due to symptom exaggeration, while low scores indicate defensive responding or minimization of symptoms. Utilizing this index is part of ensuring that the interpretation of the MMPI-2 results is accurate and beneficial for the client’s treatment plan.

Common mistakes

Filling out the MMPI-2 Score Interpretation form can be a challenging task that requires attention to detail. One common mistake individuals make is not thoroughly reading the instructions. When clients rush through the instructions, they might misunderstand the requirements for answering the items. This can lead to incomplete or inaccurate responses, ultimately skewing the results. Taking the time to read and comprehend the instructions ensures that responses reflect their true feelings and thoughts.

Another frequent error involves omitting questions. Many clients may overlook some items either out of confusion or fatigue. It’s crucial to ensure that all questions are answered, as unanswered questions can compromise the validity of the test. After the client completes the test, reviewing the answers helps catch any omissions. If discrepancies are found, asking the client to revisit those questions can help produce a more accurate profile.

Some individuals may mistakenly believe they need to complete the MMPI-2 in one sitting, leading to rushed or careless answers. The truth is that the MMPI-2 can be completed over multiple sessions. This flexibility allows clients to respond thoughtfully to each question. Encouraging clients to take their time can improve the quality of their responses and reduce stress during the process.

The format in which the MMPI-2 is administered is also essential. Clients might assume that the test must only be taken individually, overlooking the option of taking it in a group setting. While individual testing can provide more privacy, group settings can sometimes lead to a relaxed atmosphere. However, it is vital to ensure that each participant understands the test's rules and guidelines to prevent any confusion or misinterpretation of questions.

A significant pitfall related to understanding responses is when clients struggle to choose between “true” or “false” for certain items. They may become fixated on what they perceive as a perfect answer or lose time deliberating. Instead, they should be encouraged to pick the option that feels most accurate for them most of the time. Reminding clients to use a percentage approach, such as answering based on what they feel is true 51% of the time, can simplify decision-making.

Lastly, misunderstanding the significance of Validity Scales can affect interpretation. Clients may not realize that their answers on certain items reveal their level of honesty and self-awareness. Elevated scores on these scales may indicate defensiveness or a desire to present themselves in an overly positive light. Being informed about the implications of their responses helps clients provide more authentic answers.

Documents used along the form

The MMPI-2 Score Interpretation form is a crucial document utilized in psychological evaluations. It serves as a foundational tool for understanding a client's personality and psychopathology through their responses. Often, professionals will use various complementary forms and documents to ensure a comprehensive analysis of the client’s psychological state. Below is a list of additional forms commonly utilized alongside the MMPI-2 Score Interpretation form, each playing a distinct role in the evaluation process.

  • Clinical Interview Form: This document gathers detailed background information on the client, including personal history, current issues, and mental health symptoms. It helps frame the results from the MMPI-2 in a real-world context.
  • Beck Depression Inventory (BDI): This self-report questionnaire assesses the severity of depression symptoms. Professionals use it to complement MMPI-2 results, particularly if depression is a concern.
  • Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI): Designed to measure the intensity of anxiety symptoms, this inventory can provide insights that enrich the interpretations derived from the MMPI-2 scores.
  • Five-Factor Model Inventory: This personality assessment focuses on the Big Five personality traits: openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism, offering a broader understanding of the client’s personality profile.
  • Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI): This structured inventory evaluates various personality types and psychopathological conditions. It enhances the findings from the MMPI-2 by offering additional perspectives on the client’s mental health.
  • Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) Criteria Sheet: This tool assists in diagnosing mental disorders by connecting clinical symptoms with DSM-5 diagnostic criteria, ensuring accurate interpretation alongside the MMPI-2.
  • Substance Abuse Subtle Screening Inventory (SASSI): This screening tool is focused on identifying individuals at risk for substance abuse. It can provide valuable contexts, especially for clients suspected of substance-related issues.
  • Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) Worksheets: Used during treatment sessions, these worksheets help track client thoughts and behaviors, providing complementary data that can enhance the insights from the MMPI-2.
  • Trauma History Questionnaire: This questionnaire captures any past traumatic experiences the client may have faced. Understanding trauma can significantly impact the interpretation of the MMPI-2 results.

Each of these documents contributes uniquely to the overall understanding of a client's psychological profile. Utilizing them in conjunction with the MMPI-2 Score Interpretation form allows professionals to form a more holistic view, ultimately leading to better-informed decisions regarding treatment and support.

Similar forms

The MMPI-2 Score Interpretation form shares similarities with several other psychological assessment documents. Here’s a list of those documents and how they compare:

  • Beck Depression Inventory (BDI): Like the MMPI-2, the BDI evaluates symptoms of depression through self-reported items, allowing both clinician and client insights into mental health status.
  • Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R): Both tools provide a range of psychological symptoms, offering T-scores that help assess the severity and type of psychopathology present in individuals.
  • Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI): The PAI measures various personality traits and psychopathological conditions through self-reporting, similar to the MMPI-2's focus on understanding an individual’s psychological profile.
  • Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory (MCMI): This document also utilizes self-reported information and provides T-scores for various personality disorders, closely paralleling the MMPI-2 structure.
  • Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A): While focusing mainly on anxiety, it uses an item-based format to identify symptom severity, similar to the MMPI-2’s assessment style.
  • Trauma Symptom Inventory (TSI): This inventory assesses trauma symptoms over time with a scoring system that aligns with MMPI-2's T-score evaluations, offering insights into psychological impact.
  • NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R): Both assessments categorize personality characteristics, yielding profiles that help to identify individuals' tendencies using similar scoring methods.

Dos and Don'ts

When filling out the MMPI-2 Score Interpretation form, there are key practices to follow and avoid. Here’s a clear list to guide your process.

  • Do: Provide clear instructions to the client. Read the guidelines out loud to ensure understanding.
  • Do: Confirm that the client has answered all questions. Check for any omissions before proceeding with scoring.
  • Do: Allow the client ample time to complete the MMPI-2. Stress the importance of taking breaks if needed.
  • Do: Review the scoring template. Double-check placements and counts to avoid errors.
  • Do: Be cautious when interpreting the results, especially if there are numerous unanswered items.
  • Don't: Rush the client through the questionnaire. Pressure can lead to inaccurate responses.
  • Don't: Ignore the validity scales. These scores are critical for understanding the context of the results.
  • Don't: Proceed with interpretation if the client has left more than 30 items unanswered.
  • Don't: Assume higher scores always indicate severe issues. Context matters greatly.
  • Don't: Dismiss any client concerns or confusion about the questions. Address them directly.

Consider these guidelines carefully. The accuracy of the MMPI-2 interpretation depends on thorough preparation and attentive administration.

Misconceptions

Here are some common misconceptions about the MMPI-2 Score Interpretation form, along with explanations to clarify each one:

  • Misconception 1: The MMPI-2 must be completed in one sitting.
  • In reality, clients can take their time to finish the MMPI-2. They have the option to complete it over multiple sessions if needed. There’s no need to rush.

  • Misconception 2: High scores on the L Scale are always valid.
  • While elevated scores might suggest defensiveness or a desire to present oneself in a positive light, scores above a T-Score of 65 indicate an overly virtuous presentation and should not be interpreted as valid. This suggests the possibility of an inaccurate representation of the individual.

  • Misconception 3: All high F Scale scores indicate severe psychopathology.
  • High F Scale scores might imply symptom exaggeration, but they do not always indicate severe psychological issues. Factors like random responding or faking bad can contribute to these high scores. Understanding the context is essential.

  • Misconception 4: The K Scale only measures defensiveness.
  • While the K Scale does assess defensiveness, it also evaluates the client’s willingness to disclose personal information. A high K score reveals less awareness of psychological distress and can indicate more about their readiness to discuss issues candidly.

  • Misconception 5: An invalid protocol means the entire test is useless.
  • An invalid protocol does not render the entire test useless. In some cases, it may still provide valuable information and insights. It is crucial to evaluate the reasons behind invalid scores and consider any potential for interpretation with caution.

Key takeaways

Here are some key takeaways regarding the MMPI-2 Score Interpretation form:

  • Administration Process: The test can be given either individually or in a group setting. Clients should feel free to take their time completing it, and they may have items read to them if necessary.
  • Scoring Your Test: Ensure all questions are answered before scoring. Use scoring templates carefully and double-check your work to maintain accuracy.
  • Validity Concerns: The Cannot Say Scale provides important insights. A high number of unanswered questions may indicate difficulties in responding to the test.
  • Understanding Scales: T-Scores are utilized to interpret results. A score of 50 is considered average, while deviations from this can indicate potential psychological concerns.
  • Defensiveness Indicators: Elevated scores in certain scales such as the K Scale can suggest a client’s reluctance to disclose personal information or may indicate defensiveness.
  • Attention to Ranges: Pay attention to the ranges of T-Scores. Scores above 65 may signal potential psychological issues, while lower scores can suggest a healthy psychological state.