Homepage Fill Out Your Npma33 Form
Article Structure

The NPMA-33 form serves as a crucial tool in addressing the potential risks associated with wood-destroying insects in residential properties. This inspection report is generated after a thorough visual assessment of readily accessible areas within a structure, aiming to identify signs of infestations such as termites, carpenter ants, and carpenter bees. It is important to note that while this document indicates the observed condition at the time of inspection, it does not guarantee the absence of wood-destroying insects or any hidden damage that may not be immediately visible. The form details findings, which are categorized into sections that specify the presence or absence of evidence like live insects or structural damage. Furthermore, it outlines recommendations for treatment and addresses any obstructions or inaccessible areas that may have limited the inspection's scope. Notably, the NPMA-33 also emphasizes the need for consumer awareness about past treatments and ongoing maintenance to mitigate future risks. This report underscores the essential partnership between homeowners, pest control providers, and structural professionals in ensuring a pest-free living environment.

Npma33 Example

Wood Destroying Insect Inspection Report

Notice: Please read important consumer information on page 2.

Section I. General Information

 

Company’s Business Lic. No.

Date of Inspection

Inspection Company, Address & Phone

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Address of Property Inspected

 

 

 

 

 

 

Inspector’s Name, Signature & Certification, Registration, or Lic. #

 

 

Structure(s) Inspected

 

 

 

 

 

Section II. Inspection Findings This report is indicative of the condition of the above identified structure(s) on the date of inspection and is not to be construed as a guarantee or warranty against latent, concealed, or future infestations or defects. Based on a careful visual inspection of the readily accessible areas of the structure(s) inspected:

A. No visible evidence of wood destroying insects was observed.

B. Visible evidence of wood destroying insects was observed as follows:

1. Live insects (description and location):

2. Dead insects, insect parts, frass, shelter tubes, exit holes, or staining (description and location):

3. Visible damage from wood destroying insects was noted as follows (description and location):

NOTE: This is not a structural damage report. If box B above is checked, it should be understood that some degree of damage, including hidden damage, may be present. If any questions arise regarding damage indicated by this report, it is recommended that the buyer or any interested parties contact a qualified structural professional to determine the extent of damage and the need for repairs.

Yes

 

No

 

It appears that the structure(s) or a portion thereof may have been previously treated. Visible evidence of possible previous treatment:

The inspecting company can give no assurances with regard to work done by other companies. The company that performed the treatment should be contacted for information on treatment and any warranty or service agreement which may be in place.

Section III. Recommendations

No treatment recommended: (Explain if Box B in Section II is checked)

Recommend treatment for the control of:

 

Section IV. Obstructions and Inaccessible Areas

 

 

 

The inspector may write out obstructions

 

The following areas of the structure(s) inspected were obstructed or inaccessible:

 

 

 

or use the following optional key:

 

 

 

Basement

 

 

 

 

 

1.Fixedceiling

13. Only visual access

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2. Suspended ceiling

14. Cluttered condition

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Crawlspace

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3. Fixed wall covering

15. Standing water

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Main Level

 

 

 

 

4. Floor covering

16. Dense vegetation

 

 

 

 

 

 

Attic

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5.Insulation

17. Exterior siding

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6. Cabinets or shelving

18. Window well covers

 

 

 

Garage

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7. Stored items

19. Wood pile

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exterior

 

 

 

 

 

8.Furnishings

20.Snow

 

 

 

Porch

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9.Appliances

21. Unsafe conditions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Addition

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10. No access or entry 22. Rigid foam board

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11. Limited access

23. Synthetic stucco

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other

 

 

 

 

12.Noaccessbeneath

24. Duct work, plumbing,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

and/or wiring

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Section V. Additional Comments and Attachments (these are an integral part of the report)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Attachments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Signature of Seller(s) or Owner(s) if refinancing. Seller acknowledges that

Signature of Buyer. The undersigned hereby acknowledges receipt of a

 

all information regarding W.D.I. infestation, damage, repair, and treatment

copy of both page 1 and page 2 of this report and understands the information

 

history has been disclosed to the buyer.

reported.

 

 

 

X

X

 

 

 

Form NPMA-33(9/01/04) © 2004 National Pest Management Association. All Rights Reserved. No reproduction of this form is permitted without the express permission of NPMA

Page 1 of 2

Form NPCA-1 is obsolete after 12/31/04.

Important Consumer Information Regarding

the Scope and Limitations of the Inspection

Please read this entire page as it is part of this report. This report is not a guarantee or warranty as to the absence of wood destroying insects nor is it a structural integrity report. The inspector’s training and experience do not qualify the inspector in damage evaluation or any other building construction technology and/or repair.

1.About the Inspection: A visual inspection was conducted in the readily accessible areas of the structure(s) indicated (see Page 1) including attics and crawlspaces which permitted entry during the inspection. The inspection included probing and/or sounding of unobstructed and accessible areas to determine the presence or absence of visual evidence of wood destroying insects. The WDI inspection firm is not responsible to repair any damage or treat any infestation at the structure(s) inspected, except as may be provided by separate contract. Also, wood destroying insect infestation and/or damage may exist in concealed or inaccessible areas. The inspection firm cannot guarantee that any wood destroying insect infestation and/or damage disclosed by this inspection represents all of the wood destroying insect infestation and/or damage which may exist as of the date of the inspection.Forpurposesofthisinspection,wooddestroyinginsectsinclude:termites,carpenterants,carpenterbees,and reinfestingwoodboringbeetles.Thisinspectiondoesnotincludemold,mildewornoninsectwooddestroyingorganisms. This report shall be considered invalid for purposes of securing a mortgage and/or settlement of property transfer if not used within ninety (90) days from the date of inspection. This shall not be construed as a 90-day warranty. There is no warranty, express or implied, related to this report unless disclosed as required by state regulations or a written warranty or service agreement is attached.

2.Treatment Recommendation Guidelines Regarding Subterranean Termites: FHA and VA require treatment when any active infestation of subterranean termites is found. If signs of subterranean termites — but no activity — are found in a structure that shows no evidence of having been treated for subterranean termites in the past, then a treatment should be recommended. A treatment may also be recommended for a previously treated structure showing evidence of subterranean termites — but no activity — if there is no documentation of a liquid treatment by a licensed pest control company within the previous five years unless the structure is presently under warranty or covered by a service agreement with a licensed pest control company.

3.Obstructions and Inaccessible Areas: No inspection was made in areas which required the breaking apart or into, dismantling,

removal of any object, including but not limited to: moldings, floor coverings, wall coverings, siding, fixed ceilings, insulation, furniture, appliances, and/or personal possessions; nor were areas inspected which were obstructed or inaccessible for physical access on the date of inspection. Your inspector may write out inaccessible areas or use the key in Section IV. Crawl spaces, attics, and/or other areas may be deemed inaccessible if the opening to the area is not large enough to provide physical access for the inspector or if a ladder was required for access. Crawl spaces (or portions thereof) may also be deemed inaccessible if there is less than 24 inches of clearance from the bottom of the floor joists to the surface below. If any area which has been reported as inaccessible is made accessible, the inspection company may be contacted for another inspection. An additional fee may apply.

4.Consumer Maintenance Advisory Regarding Integrated Pest Management for Prevention of Wood Destroying Insects. Any structure can be attacked by wood destroying insects. Homeowners should be aware of and try to eliminate conditions which promote insect infestation in and around their structure(s). Factors which may lead to wood destroying insect infestation include: earth to wood contact, foam insulation at foundation in contact with soil, faulty grade, improper drainage, firewood against structure(s), insufficient ventilation, moisture, wood debris in crawlspace, wood mulch or ground cover in contact with the structure, tree branches touching structure(s), landscape timbers and wood decay. Should these or other conditions exist, corrective measures should be taken in order to reduce the chances of infestation of wood destroying insects and the need for treatment.

5.Neither the inspecting company nor the inspector has had, presently has, or contemplates having any interest in the property inspected.

Form NPMA-33(9/01/04) © 2004 National Pest Management Association. All Rights Reserved. No reproduction of this form is permitted without the express permission of NPMA

Page 2 of 2

Form NPCA-1 is obsolete after 12/31/04.

 

Form Characteristics

Fact Name Fact Description
Purpose The NPMA-33 form is used for Wood Destroying Insect Inspection Reports.
Inspection Scope The inspection covers readily accessible areas of the property, including attics and crawl spaces.
Not a Guarantee This report does not guarantee the absence of wood destroying insects or structural integrity.
Inspection Date The date of inspection is critical as the report is valid for 90 days.
Licensing The inspection company must provide their business license number on the form.
Visible Evidence The form allows for the documentation of visible evidence of wood destroying insects.
Previous Treatments The report may indicate if the property has been previously treated for infestations.
Recommendations It may recommend treatment for control if evidence of infestation is found.
Consumer Information There is a section that informs consumers about the scope and limitations of the inspection.
Governing Law In many states, specific regulations govern pest control and inspection reports, affecting their use.

Guidelines on Utilizing Npma33

After gathering all the necessary information, filling out the NPMA-33 form is the next step. This form is used to report the condition of a structure concerning wood-destroying insects. Below are the steps to properly fill out the form.

  1. Company's Business License Number: Write the business license number of the pest control company that is conducting the inspection.
  2. Date of Inspection: Enter the date when the inspection took place.
  3. Inspection Company, Address & Phone: Fill in the name, address, and phone number of the inspection company.
  4. Address of Property Inspected: Provide the full address of the property that was inspected.
  5. Inspector's Name, Signature & Certification, Registration, or License Number: Write the name and signature of the inspector, along with their certification or license number.
  6. Structures Inspected: Indicate the structure(s) that were inspected.

Now, move on to Section II. Here you will note the findings from the inspection.

  1. No visible evidence: Check the box if no visible wood-destroying insects were found.
  2. Visible evidence: If there is visible evidence, check the appropriate box and provide descriptions and locations for:
    • Live insects
    • Dead insects, insect parts, frass, shelter tubes, exit holes, or staining
    • Visible damage from wood destroying insects
  3. Prior Treatment: Check “Yes” or “No” if the structure may have been previously treated. Describe any visible evidence of such treatment.

Proceed to Section III to list recommendations:

  1. No Treatment Recommended: Provide an explanation if the box in Section II is checked.
  2. Recommended Treatment: List any recommended treatment for controlling wood-destroying insects.

For Section IV, specify any obstructions and inaccessible areas that may have affected the inspection.

  1. Obstructions: Write any areas that were obstructed or inaccessible, using the optional key if applicable.

Finally, move on to Section V for any additional comments and required signatures.

  1. Additional Comments: Provide any further insights or notes related to the inspection.
  2. Attachments: Note any attachments that are part of the report.
  3. Signature of Seller(s) or Owner(s): If refinancing, obtain the seller's signature acknowledging the information.
  4. Signature of Buyer: Obtain the buyer's signature to confirm acknowledgment of the report.

What You Should Know About This Form

What is the purpose of the NPMA-33 form?

The NPMA-33 form serves as a Wood Destroying Insect Inspection Report. Its primary purpose is to document the findings of a visual inspection conducted on a property for signs of wood-destroying insects, such as termites and carpenter ants. This report aids buyers, sellers, and property owners in understanding the condition of the property regarding potential infestations and any visible damage caused by these insects. Importantly, it should not be seen as a warranty against future infestations, structural issues, or hidden damages.

What does the report include regarding inspection findings?

The report includes detailed sections on the general information about the inspection company, the property inspected, and the inspector's credentials. It documents whether or not visible signs of wood-destroying insects were found during a visual inspection. Should evidence of pests be discovered, the report details specific findings such as live insects, dead insects, and any damage noted. Additional notes may indicate previous treatments and any inaccessible areas that could affect the inspection's thoroughness.

Are there limitations to the inspection as per the NPMA-33 form?

Yes, the NPMA-33 form explicitly outlines limitations concerning the inspection. The report does not guarantee the absence of wood-destroying insects or structural integrity. It specifies that the inspection is visual and does not cover areas that were inaccessible or obstructed during the assessment. Concealed damages or infestations may exist beyond what was identified in the inspection. For comprehensive evaluations, especially regarding structural damage, consultation with a qualified structural professional is recommended.

What actions are recommended in case wood-destroying insects are discovered?

If evidence of wood-destroying insects is found at the property, the inspector will recommend treatment to control the infestations. The specifics of the recommended treatment depend on the type of insect observed and the extent of the evidence. The buyer or property owner may also be advised to contact a licensed pest control service to discuss treatments, potential warranties, or service agreements tied to previous inspections or treatments.

What should buyers understand after receiving the NPMA-33 report?

Upon reviewing the NPMA-33 report, buyers should acknowledge the necessity of fully understanding the implications of the findings, including any potential previous treatments or issues noted. They should recognize that this report is part of their due diligence in real estate transactions. It is imperative to grasp that this document is not a warranty and that ongoing vigilance, alongside regular inspections, can prevent future infestations. Buyers should keep in mind their rights to seek further evaluations and treatments as needed.

Common mistakes

Filling out the NPMA-33 form requires careful attention to detail. One common mistake is failing to provide accurate information in the General Information section. It’s essential that the inspection company's license number, date of inspection, and the address of the property be clearly and accurately recorded. Inaccuracies in this information could result in difficulties if any follow-up action is needed, especially regarding disputes or claims.

Another frequent error involves neglecting to check the appropriate boxes in Section II: Inspection Findings. This section is crucial for determining the presence of wood-destroying insects. If the inspector finds visible evidence, it’s imperative to specify what was observed. Conversely, if no evidence is found, the correct box must be checked. Misrepresenting the findings, whether intentionally or accidentally, could lead to misunderstandings about the state of the property.

Completing the Obstructions and Inaccessible Areas section can also be problematic. Inspectors must clearly indicate any areas that were not accessible during the inspection. Neglecting to document these obstructions may mislead future buyers or inspectors regarding the thoroughness of the evaluation. Areas that were inaccessible can include spaces like attics or crawlspaces that require special equipment for entry.

A failure to provide adequate recommendations in Section III can hinder the report's effectiveness. If evidence of wood-destroying insects is found, the inspector must make appropriate treatment recommendations. Recommendations should be clear and specific; otherwise, buyers may not understand the necessary next steps. This gap can lead to further issues, especially if the infestation worsens over time.

Omitting signatures from Section V poses another significant mistake. The signature of both the seller and the buyer is crucial as it acknowledges receipt of the report. Without these signatures, the validity of the document could be questioned, leading to potential legal ramifications. It’s important to ensure that all required signatures are obtained to validate the transaction.

Misinterpretation of important consumer information regarding the scope of the inspection presents yet another mistake. Buyers should not view the inspection as a warranty against all future infestations. Understanding the limitations of the inspection is vital. Failure to communicate this to the buyer could create expectations that are not grounded in reality, resulting in disputes later.

Lastly, individuals often disregard the time limitations regarding the validity of the inspection report. The document is valid for only 90 days from the inspection date. Ignoring this timeline may lead to clients relying on an outdated report when making critical decisions about treatment or property transactions. It is crucial for all parties involved to be aware of this timeframe to avoid complications.

Documents used along the form

The NPMA33 form is a crucial document used in the inspection of properties for wood-destroying insects. Several other documents and forms often accompany this report to provide comprehensive information about the property being inspected. The following is a list of related forms and documents that are commonly used in conjunction with the NPMA33.

  • Wood-Destroying Insect Treatment Proposal: This document outlines the recommended treatment methods for controlling wood-destroying insects. It includes details about the types of treatments available, costs, and expected outcomes. Homeowners can make informed decisions based on this proposal.
  • WDI History Report: This form provides a history of past treatments or infestations at the property. It is essential for buyers or sellers to be aware of any previous issues that may affect their decision-making regarding treatment or purchase.
  • Seller's Disclosure Statement: Sellers often complete this statement to disclose any known issues with the property, including past infestations or repairs related to wood-destroying insects. This document helps buyers assess potential risks associated with the property.
  • Inspection Agreement: Prior to conducting an inspection, this agreement is signed by the homeowner and the inspection company. It outlines the scope of the inspection, responsibilities of both parties, and any limitations concerning the report.
  • Exemption Certificate: In certain cases, properties may qualify for an exemption from pest control measures due to specific conditions or regulations. This certificate verifies that a property meets the necessary criteria for such an exemption.

Each of these documents plays a vital role in the inspection process. Understanding them can help both buyers and sellers navigate the complexities of property transactions involving wood-destroying insects. Access to comprehensive information fosters informed decisions and promotes transparency between parties.

Similar forms

  • NPMA-1 Form: This is another pest inspection report focused on wood-destroying organisms, similar to the NPMA-33. While the NPMA-33 highlights visible evidence and inspection findings, the NPMA-1 primarily serves as a basic documentation form for pest inspections.
  • FHA Home Inspection Report: This document is used during home loans backed by the Federal Housing Administration. It includes vital information about the home’s structural integrity and pest inspection status, paralleling the safety assessment aspect of the NPMA-33.
  • VA Termite Inspection Report: Required for properties under a VA loan, this report also documents the presence of wood-destroying insects. Like the NPMA-33, it emphasizes the inspection of accessible areas and provides recommendations based on findings.
  • Real Estate Purchase Agreement Addendum: Often, this addendum contains terms related to pest inspections. Similar to the NPMA-33, it may require a clear assessment of wood-destroying insects as a condition of sale, helping protect buyers.
  • Wood Infestation Report (WIR): This report focuses specifically on identifying wood-destroying insects. It shares similarities with the NPMA-33 as both documents provide an inspection summary and recommend treatments based on findings.
  • Structural Pest Control Inspection Report: This document involves a thorough inspection of properties for pests, and similar to the NPMA-33, it does not provide guarantees against future infestations, focusing instead on current findings.
  • Home Inspection Report: This comprehensive report assesses various aspects of a property, including pest issues. Like the NPMA-33, it can identify potential problems but typically encapsulates a broader range of home conditions.

Dos and Don'ts

When filling out the NPMA-33 form, it is important to be thorough and accurate. The following lists outline key actions to take and to avoid during this process:

  • Ensure all sections of the form are completed accurately.
  • Provide clear descriptions of any signs of wood destroying insects.
  • Keep a copy of the completed form for your records.
  • Encourage open communication between the buyer and inspector regarding findings.
  • Submit the form within the designated timeframe to avoid invalidation.
  • Avoid using vague language when describing observations.
  • Do not leave sections blank unless they are not applicable.
  • Refrain from making assumptions about past treatments without documentation.
  • Do not ignore the recommendations for future maintenance and prevention.
  • Do not forget to include signatures where required.

Misconceptions

Understanding the NPMA-33 form can be challenging, leading to several misconceptions. Here’s a breakdown of common misunderstandings about this important document:

  • It guarantees the absence of wood destroying insects. Many believe the NPMA-33 offers a guarantee that no pests are present. In reality, it’s based on a visual inspection, and does not ensure future infestations.
  • It covers structural integrity. Some assume that the inspection evaluates the overall structural soundness. However, this form does not assess the integrity of the entire structure; it focuses solely on wood destroying insects.
  • All areas of the property are inspected. Individuals might think the inspector examines every nook and cranny. In fact, inaccessible areas or those obstructed are not included in the inspection.
  • Previous treatments are always noted. People often believe that previous pest treatments will always show up in the report. Unfortunately, the inspecting company cannot guarantee that elements from prior treatments will be visible during their inspection.
  • The report is valid indefinitely. Some think the report is valid as long as the property remains unsold. In truth, it is only valid for 90 days from the date of inspection unless stated otherwise.
  • The inspector is qualified to evaluate damage. Many believe the inspector has the training to assess damage from infestations. However, the experience and qualifications of the inspector do not include evaluations of structural damage.
  • It guarantees no hidden damage. A prevalent belief is that if no insects are found during the inspection, there is no hidden damage. This is not true; the form explicitly notes that pests could be hidden from view.
  • The NPMA-33 form includes mold and mildew assessments. Some people mistakenly think that this report covers mold and mildew. In fact, the form specifically focuses on wood destroying insects and does not address other types of infestations.
  • It does not recommend preventive measures. Lastly, there’s a misconception that the NPMA-33 only deals with current infestations. The report also advises homeowners on maintenance practices to prevent future infestations.

Understanding these misconceptions can help homeowners and buyers make informed decisions regarding pest inspections and treatments. Being well-informed can lead to effective pest management and a safer living environment.

Key takeaways

  • Understanding the Purpose: The NPMA 33 form is designed to document the findings of a wood-destroying insect inspection. It is crucial to view this report as a reflection of the property’s condition on the inspection date and not as a guarantee against future infestations.
  • Inspection Scope: The inspection involves a visual assessment of areas that are readily accessible, including attics and crawlspaces. However, it does not cover concealed spaces, meaning that infestations can still exist even if no signs are visible at the time of inspection.
  • Obstructions: The report outlines areas that were inaccessible due to obstructions. It is important to note these areas, as their inaccessibility limits the comprehensiveness of the inspection.
  • Reporting Findings: Section II details any visible evidence of wood-destroying insects, such as live or dead insects, and any signs of damage. If issues are identified, it may indicate the presence of further hidden damage.
  • Recommendations for Treatment: The form provides guidance on whether treatment is necessary. If infestations are found, the inspector may recommend specific control measures and advise contacting a qualified pest control professional.
  • Consumer Awareness: Buyers and owners should be aware that the inspection is not a structural integrity evaluation. Engaging a structural professional is advisable if damage is indicated.
  • Importance of Timeliness: The NPMA 33 report is valid for a period of 90 days from the date of inspection. It is crucial to act within this timeframe, especially when attempting to secure financing or complete the property transfer process.