TemplatesOwl
Homepage ↦ Fill Out Your Prop 47 Form
Article Structure

The Proposition 47 form represents a significant shift in California's approach to criminal sentencing, specifically targeting nonserious and nonviolent property and drug crimes. This measure mandates that certain offenses, such as drug possession, petty theft, and writing bad checks, be classified as misdemeanors rather than felonies, provided that the value involved is $950 or less. It allows for resentencing opportunities for individuals currently serving felony sentences for these applicable crimes unless they present an unreasonable public safety risk. Furthermore, Proposition 47 is not only about reducing penalties; it also ensures that the financial savings resulting from these changes are redirected into community services, including mental health and drug treatment programs, school truancy interventions, and victim services. By lowering the costs associated with incarceration, the initiative aims to alleviate overcrowding in jails while promoting rehabilitation through community support. Ultimately, this form reflects a balance between addressing public safety concerns and fostering a more rehabilitative approach to criminal justice, indicating a shift towards treating addiction and minor offenses with understanding rather than strict punishment.

Prop 47 Example

Proposi tion Criminal Sentences. Misdemeanor Penalties. Initiative Statute.

47

Official Title and Summary

Prepared by the Attorney General

 

 

Criminal Sentences. Misdemeanor Penalties. Initiative Statute.

•Requires misdemeanor sentence instead of felony for certain drug possession offenses.

•Requires misdemeanor sentence instead of felony for the following crimes when amount involved is $950 or less: petty theft, receiving stolen property, and forging/writing bad checks.

•Allows felony sentence for these offenses if person has previous conviction for crimes such as rape, murder, or child molestation or is registered sex offender.

•Requires resentencing for persons serving felony sentences for these offenses unless court finds unreasonable public safety risk.

•Applies savings to mental health and drug treatment programs, K–12 schools, and crime victims.

Summary of Legislative Analyst’s Estimate of Net State and Local Government Fiscal Impact:

47

•Net state criminal justice system savings that could reach the low hundreds of millions of dollars annually. These savings would be spent on school truancy and dropout prevention, mental health and substance abuse treatment, and victim services.

• Net county criminal justice system savings that could reach several hundred million dollars annually.

Analysis by the Legislative Analyst

Background

There are three types of crimes: felonies, misdemeanors, and infractions. A felony is the most serious type of crime. Existing law classifies some felonies as “violent” or “serious,” or both. Examples of felonies currently defined as both violent and serious include murder, robbery, and rape. Felonies that are not classified as violent or serious include grand theft (not involving a gun) and possession of illegal drugs. A misdemeanor is a less serious crime. Misdemeanors include crimes such as assault and public drunkenness. An infraction is the least serious crime and is usually punished with a fine. For example, possession of less than one ounce of marijuana for personal use is an infraction.

Felony Sentencing. In recent years, there has been an average of about 220,000 annual felony convictions in California. Offenders convicted of felonies can be sentenced as follows:

•State Prison. Felony offenders who have current or prior convictions for serious, violent, or sex crimes can be sentenced to state prison. Offenders who are released from prison after serving a sentence for a serious or violent crime are supervised in the community by state parole agents. Offenders who are released from prison

after serving a sentence for a crime that is not a serious or violent crime are usually supervised in the community by county probation officers. Offenders who break the rules that they are required to follow while supervised in the community can be sent to county jail or state prison, depending on their criminal history and the seriousness of the violation.

•County Jail and Community Supervision. Felony offenders who have no current or prior convictions for serious, violent, or sex offenses are typically sentenced to county jail or the supervision of a county probation officer in the community, or both. In addition, depending on the discretion of the judge and what crime was committed, some offenders who have current or prior convictions for serious, violent, or sex offenses can receive similar sentences. Offenders who break the rules that they are required to follow while supervised in the community can be sent to county jail or state prison, depending on their criminal history and the seriousness of the violation.

Misdemeanor Sentencing. Under current law, offenders convicted of misdemeanors may be sentenced to county jail, county community

34 | Title and Summary / Analysis

Prop Criminal Sentences. Misdemeanor Penalties. Initiative Statute.

47

Analysis by the Legislative Analyst

Continued

supervision, a fine, or some combination of the three. Offenders on county community supervision for a misdemeanor crime may be placed in jail if they break the rules that they are required to follow while supervised in the community.

In general, offenders convicted of misdemeanor crimes are punished less severely than felony offenders. For example, misdemeanor crimes carry a maximum sentence of up to one year in jail while felony offenders can spend much longer periods in prison or jail. In addition, offenders who are convicted of a misdemeanor are usually supervised in the community for fewer years and may not be supervised as closely by probation officers.

Wobbler Sentencing. Under current law, some crimes—such as check forgery and being found in possession of stolen property—can be charged as either a felony or a misdemeanor. These crimes are known as “wobblers.” Courts decide how to charge wobbler crimes based on the details of the crime and the criminal history of the offender.

Proposal

This measure reduces penalties for certain offenders convicted of nonserious and nonviolent property and drug crimes. The measure also allows certain offenders who have been previously convicted of such crimes to apply for reduced sentences. In addition, the measure requires any state savings that result from the measure be spent to support truancy (unexcused absences) prevention, mental health and substance abuse treatment, and victim services. These changes are described in more detail below.

Reduction of Existing Penalties

This measure reduces certain nonserious and nonviolent property and drug offenses from wobblers or felonies to misdemeanors. The measure limits these reduced penalties to offenders who have not committed certain severe crimes listed in the measure—including murder and certain sex and gun crimes. Specifically, the measure reduces the penalties for the following crimes:

•Grand Theft. Under current law, theft of property worth $950 or less is often charged as petty theft, which is a misdemeanor or an infraction. However, such crimes can sometimes be charged as grand theft, which is generally a wobbler. For example, a wobbler

charge can occur if the crime involves the theft of certain property (such as cars) or if the offender has previously committed certain theft-related crimes. This measure would limit when theft of property of $950 or less can be charged as grand theft. Specifically, such crimes would no longer be charged as grand theft solely because of the type of property involved or because the defendant had previously committed certain theft-related crimes.

•Shoplifting. Under current law, shoplifting property worth $950 or less (a type of petty theft) is often a misdemeanor. However, such crimes can also be charged as burglary, which is a wobbler. Under this measure, shoplifting

property worth $950 or less would always be a

 

misdemeanor and could not be charged as

47

burglary.

•Receiving Stolen Property. Under current law, individuals found with stolen property may be charged with receiving stolen property, which is a wobbler crime. Under this measure, receiving stolen property worth $950 or less would always be a misdemeanor.

•Writing Bad Checks. Under current law, writing a bad check is generally a misdemeanor. However, if the check is worth more than $450, or if the offender has previously committed a crime related to forgery, it is a wobbler crime. Under this measure, it would be a misdemeanor to write a bad check unless the check is worth more than $950 or the offender had previously committed three forgery related crimes, in which case it would remain a wobbler crime.

•Check Forgery. Under current law, it is a wobbler crime to forge a check of any amount. Under this measure, forging a check worth $950 or less would always be a misdemeanor, except that it would remain a wobbler crime if the offender commits identity theft in connection with forging a check.

•Drug Possession. Under current law, possession for personal use of most illegal drugs (such as cocaine or heroin) is a misdemeanor, a wobbler, or a felony—depending on the amount and type of drug. Under this measure, such crimes would always be misdemeanors. The measure would not change the penalty for possession of

For the full text of Proposition 47, see page 70.

Analysis | 35

Prop Criminal Sentences. Misdemeanor Penalties. Initiative Statute.

47

Analysis by the Legislative Analyst

Continued

marijuana, which is currently either an infraction or a misdemeanor.

We estimate that about 40,000 offenders annually are convicted of the above crimes and would be affected by the measure. However, this estimate is based on the limited available data and the actual number could be thousands of offenders higher or lower.

Change in Penalties for These Offenders. As the above crimes are nonserious and nonviolent, most offenders are currently being handled at the county level. Under this measure, that would continue to be the case. However, the length of sentences—jail time and/or community supervision—would be less. A relatively small portion—about one-tenth—of offenders of the above crimes are currently sent to state

47prison (generally, because they had a prior serious or violent conviction). Under this measure, none of these offenders would be sent to state prison. Instead, they would serve lesser sentences at the county level.

Resentencing of Previously Convicted Offenders

This measure allows offenders currently serving felony sentences for the above crimes to apply to have their felony sentences reduced to misdemeanor sentences. In addition, certain offenders who have already completed a sentence for a felony that the measure changes could apply to the court to have their felony conviction changed to a misdemeanor. However, no offender who has committed a specified severe crime could be resentenced or have their conviction changed. In addition, the measure states that a court is not required to resentence an offender currently serving a felony sentence if the court finds it likely that the offender will commit a specified severe crime. Offenders who are resentenced would be required to be on state parole for one year, unless the judge chooses to remove that requirement.

Funding for Truancy Prevention, Treatment, and Victim Services

The measure requires that the annual savings to the state from the measure, as estimated by the Governor’s administration, be annually transferred from the General Fund into a new state fund, the Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Fund. Under the measure, monies in the fund would be divided as follows:

•25 percent for grants aimed at reducing truancy and drop-outs among K–12 students in public schools.

•10 percent for victim services grants.

•65 percent to support mental health and drug abuse treatment services that are designed to help keep individuals out of prison and jail.

Fiscal Effects

This measure would have a number of fiscal effects on the state and local governments. The size of these effects would depend on several key factors. In particular, it would depend on the way individuals are currently being sentenced for the felony crimes changed by this measure. Currently, there is limited data available on this, particularly at the county level. The fiscal effects would also depend on how certain provisions in the measure are implemented, including how offenders would be sentenced for crimes changed by the measure. For example, it is uncertain whether such offenders would be sentenced to jail or community supervision and for how long. In addition, the fiscal effects would depend heavily on the number of crimes affected by the measure that are committed in the future. Thus, the fiscal effects of the measure described below are subject to significant uncertainty.

State Effects of Reduced Penalties

The proposed reduction in penalties would affect state prison, parole, and court costs.

State Prison and Parole. This measure makes two changes that would reduce the state prison population and associated costs. First, changing future crimes from felonies and wobblers to misdemeanors would make fewer offenders eligible for state prison sentences. We estimate that this could result in an ongoing reduction to the state prison population of several thousand inmates within a few years. Second, the resentencing of inmates currently in state prison could result in the release of several thousand inmates, temporarily reducing the state prison population for a few years after the measure becomes law.

In addition, the resentencing of individuals currently serving sentences for felonies that are changed to misdemeanors would temporarily increase the state parole population by a couple thousand parolees over a three-year period. The costs associated with this

36 | Analysis

Prop Criminal Sentences. Misdemeanor Penalties. Initiative Statute.

47

Analysis by the Legislative Analyst

Continued

increase in the parole population would temporarily offset a portion of the above prison savings.

State Courts. Under the measure, the courts would experience a one-time increase in costs resulting from the resentencing of offenders and from changing the sentences of those who have already completed their sentences. However, the above costs to the courts would be partly offset by savings in other areas. First, because misdemeanors generally take less court time to process than felonies, the proposed reduction in penalties would reduce the amount of resources needed for such cases. Second, the measure would reduce the amount of time offenders spend on county community supervision, resulting in fewer offenders being supervised at any given time. This would likely reduce the number of court hearings for offenders who break the rules that they are required to follow while supervised in the community. Overall, we estimate that the measure could result in a net increase in court costs for a few years with net annual savings thereafter.

Summary of State Fiscal Effects. In total, we estimate that the effects described above could eventually result in net state criminal justice system savings in the low hundreds of millions of dollars annually, primarily from an ongoing reduction in the prison population of several thousand inmates. As noted earlier, any state savings would be deposited in the Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Fund to support various purposes.

County Effects of Reduced Penalties

The proposed reduction in penalties would also affect county jail and community supervision operations, as well as those of various other county agencies (such as public defenders and district attorneys’ offices).

County Jail and Community Supervision. The proposed reduction in penalties would have various effects on the number of individuals in county jails. Most significantly, the measure would reduce the jail population as most offenders whose sentence currently includes a jail term would stay in jail for a shorter time period. In addition, some offenders currently serving sentences in jail for certain felonies could be eligible for release. These reductions would be slightly offset by an increase in the jail population as offenders who would otherwise have been sentenced to state prison would now be placed in jail. On balance, we estimate that the total number of statewide county jail beds

freed up by these changes could reach into the low tens of thousands annually within a few years. We note, however, that this would not necessarily result in a reduction in the county jail population of a similar size. This is because many county jails are currently overcrowded and, therefore, release inmates early. Such jails could use the available jail space created by the measure to reduce such early releases.

We also estimate that county community supervision populations would decline. This is because offenders would likely spend less time under such supervision if they were sentenced for a misdemeanor instead of a felony. Thus, county probation departments could experience a reduction in their caseloads of tens of thousands of offenders within a few years after the measure becomes law.

Other County Criminal Justice System Effects. As

discussed above, the reduction in penalties would 47 increase workload associated with resentencing in the short run. However, the changes would reduce workload associated with both felony filings and other court hearings (such as for offenders who break the

rules of their community supervision) in the long run. As a result, while county district attorneys’ and public defenders’ offices (who participate in these hearings) and county sheriffs (who provide court security) could experience an increase in workload in the first few years, their workload would be reduced on an ongoing basis in the long run.

Summary of County Fiscal Effects. We estimate that the effects described above could result in net criminal justice system savings to the counties of several hundred million dollars annually, primarily from freeing jail capacity.

Effects of Increased Services Funded by the Measure

Under the measure, the above savings would be used to provide additional funding for truancy prevention, mental health and drug abuse treatment, and other programs designed to keep offenders out of prison and jail. If such funding increased participation in these programs and made participants less likely to commit future crimes, the measure could result in future additional savings to the state and counties.

Visit http://cal-access.sos.ca.gov for details

about money contributed in this contest.

For the full text of Proposition 47, see page 70.

Analysis | 37
Get Prop 47 PDF Form

Form Characteristics

Fact Name Details
Official Title Proposition 47: Criminal Sentences. Misdemeanor Penalties. Initiative Statute.
Misdemeanor Requirement This law requires that certain drug possession offenses and property crimes involving amounts of $950 or less be charged as misdemeanors instead of felonies.
Prior Conviction Exception A felony sentence may still be applied to offenders with previous convictions for serious crimes such as rape, murder, or child molestation.
Resentencing Provision Individuals serving felony sentences for specific offenses can apply for resentencing to a misdemeanor unless deemed a public safety risk.
Allocation of Savings Net savings from the measure are directed to support mental health programs, K-12 schools, and crime victim services through the Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Fund.

Guidelines on Utilizing Prop 47

Completing the Proposition 47 form is an important step for individuals seeking to apply for reduced sentences under recent legal changes. Following the guidelines and carefully filling out all required sections will facilitate the processing of your application.

  1. Obtain the Form: Visit your local courthouse or download the Proposition 47 form from the official website.
  2. Read the Instructions: Familiarize yourself with the form’s instructions before starting to fill it out.
  3. Provide Personal Information: Enter your full name, address, and contact information in the designated sections.
  4. Fill in Case Information: Include details about your previous conviction, such as the case number, date of conviction, and the specific offense.
  5. Indicate Eligibility: Clearly mark whether you meet the eligibility criteria for resentencing under Proposition 47.
  6. Complete the Signature Section: Sign and date the form where indicated to certify that the information provided is true and accurate.
  7. Submit the Form: File the completed form at the appropriate court. Make sure to keep a copy for your records.

Once the form is submitted, the court will review your application and notify you of the next steps in the process regarding your resentencing. It is advisable to remain attentive to any communications from the court and respond promptly as required.

What You Should Know About This Form

What is Proposition 47?

Proposition 47, also known as the Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Act, is a law that reduces penalties for certain nonviolent and nonserious crimes in California. The measure allows for misdemeanor sentences instead of felony sentences for specific drug possessions and property crimes when the value involved is $950 or less. It also allows people currently serving felony sentences for these offenses to seek resentencing.

Which offenses are affected by Proposition 47?

Proposition 47 affects several nonserious offenses, including certain drug possession cases and property crimes like petty theft, receiving stolen property, and writing bad checks, as long as the value is $950 or less. Importantly, offenders with prior convictions for violent crimes, such as murder or rape, are excluded from these reduced penalties.

How does Proposition 47 change sentencing for existing offenses?

The measure reclassifies various crimes from felonies or wobblers to misdemeanors, leading to less severe penalties. Offenders charged with affected crimes will generally face shorter jail time and less strict community supervision. This change seeks to align sentences with the nonviolent nature of the offenses.

What are the provisions for resentencing under Proposition 47?

Individuals currently serving felony sentences for eligible offenses can file to have their sentences reduced to misdemeanors. Furthermore, those who have completed their sentence for a felony conviction that is now a misdemeanor under Proposition 47 can also apply for a change in their record. However, this option is not available to offenders convicted of designated serious crimes.

How are the savings from Proposition 47 allocated?

Proposition 47 requires that any savings generated from reduced incarceration costs be deposited into a new fund called the Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Fund. This fund's allocations include 25% for programs to reduce school truancy and dropout rates, 65% for mental health and drug treatment services, and 10% for victim services.

What fiscal impact does Proposition 47 have on state and local governments?

The implementation of Proposition 47 is projected to result in significant annual savings for both state and county justice systems, potentially reaching hundreds of millions of dollars. These savings will not only contribute to reduced jail populations but will also support essential social services aimed at preventing crime and supporting at-risk populations.

Can individuals still be sentenced to prison for offenses covered by Proposition 47?

Generally, Proposition 47 prohibits prison sentences for those whose offenses fall under its provisions, unless the individual has prior convictions for severe crimes. In such cases, a felony sentence may still apply. For the eligible offenders, they are primarily directed to serve lesser sentences within county jails or under community supervision.

Common mistakes

Filling out the Prop 47 form can be a crucial step for individuals seeking to benefit from its provisions regarding criminal sentencing reductions. However, several common mistakes can hinder this process. Here are some of the frequent pitfalls to be aware of when completing the form.

One significant mistake is not providing accurate or complete personal information. Individuals should ensure that their name, address, and contact details are correctly entered. Incomplete or incorrect information can lead to delays or even rejection of the application.

Another common error occurs when applicants fail to understand their criminal history. It’s vital to disclose all relevant convictions accurately. Omitting a conviction or mistakenly classifying one can lead to complications in the application process. Additionally, checking for prior convictions that may disqualify one from applying under the new terms is essential.

Individuals often overlook the importance of attaching supporting documentation. Required documents might include court records or proof of previous convictions. Not including these documents could result in a denial or a request for further information, slowing down the process.

Misunderstanding eligibility criteria presents another challenge. Some applicants may wrongly assume they qualify for resentencing when, in fact, disqualifying convictions prevent it. Familiarity with the specific offenses that trigger eligibility is crucial.

Failure to sign the form can be a surprisingly frequent oversight. Even if all sections are filled out correctly, an unsigned application is invalid and will not be processed. Applicants must remember to sign and date the form before submission.

People might also incorrectly calculate the value of stolen property, which could affect how they categorize their charges. The threshold of $950 is imperative; inaccuracies here can impact the outcome of the application.

Another misunderstanding can stem from the interpretation of the law itself. Some individuals may attempt to argue legal defenses or make claims regarding their character within the application. The form should focus solely on factual details rather than opinions or extenuating circumstances.

Finally, individuals sometimes miss the deadlines for submission or fail to follow the instructions for the specific submission process. Keeping track of timelines and ensuring the form is submitted in compliance with any outlined methods is critical to ensuring the application is not dismissed.

Being aware of these common mistakes can help individuals prepare better for filling out the Prop 47 form. Attention to detail throughout the process will not only help in reducing potential setbacks but also improve the chances of a successful application.

Documents used along the form

The Proposition 47 form is associated with several important documents and forms that facilitate the implementation of its provisions. Each of these documents plays a crucial role in promoting the objectives of Proposition 47, which aims to reform misdemeanor penalties and enhance the justice system. Below is a list of commonly used forms and their descriptions.

  • Resentencing Application Form: This form allows individuals currently serving felony sentences for eligible offenses under Proposition 47 to request a reduction in their sentence to a misdemeanor.
  • Verification of Eligibility Form: Used to confirm whether an individual qualifies for resentencing based on their previous convictions and the nature of the current charge.
  • Judicial Council Form CR-180: This is a standardized form utilized by courts to process a petition for a felony conviction to be designated as a misdemeanor following successful completion of the sentence.
  • Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Fund Allocation Document: Details how savings from reduced sentencing costs will be allocated to support drug treatment, mental health programs, and truancy prevention initiatives.
  • Community Supervision Plan Template: A plan that outlines the terms and conditions for offenders released under community supervision instead of incarceration.
  • Public Safety Risk Assessment Form: This document is used to evaluate whether a resentencing request poses an unreasonable risk to public safety, influencing the court's decision on such applications.
  • Court Hearing Notification Form: Required to inform involved parties about upcoming hearings related to resentencing applications or status updates pertaining to cases affected by Proposition 47.
  • Victim Notification Form: A form that ensures victims of the original crime are informed of changes in the offender's status, including petitions for resentencing.

In summary, these documents work in conjunction with the Proposition 47 form to create a streamlined process for addressing felony sentences and helping individuals reintegrate into society. Their careful use ensures that the objectives of the proposition are met while maintaining public safety and offering necessary support services.

Similar forms

  • Proposition 36: Similar to Prop 47, Proposition 36 focuses on nonviolent drug offenses, allowing eligible individuals to seek probation instead of serving time in prison. Both measures emphasize redirecting resources toward treatment instead of incarceration.

  • AB 109 (Realignment): This law shifts certain nonviolent offenders from state prison to county jails. Like Prop 47, AB 109 aims to alleviate overcrowding in prisons while providing community-based supervision and support, leading to a more rehabilitative approach.

  • Measure M: Measure M seeks to reduce penalties for certain low-level offenses, similarly to Prop 47. Both measures promote the idea that those convicted of minor crimes should face less severe consequences, emphasizing rehabilitation and societal reintegration.

  • Three Strikes Reform (Proposition 36): This initiative alters the three strikes law to ensure that only serious or violent offenses count as “strikes.” Like Prop 47, it encourages reduced sentences for certain offenders, thereby decreasing prison populations and focusing on nonviolent behavior.

  • Proposition 57: This measure allows nonviolent felons to earn early release credits for good behavior. Similar to Prop 47, it shifts the focus from punishment to rehabilitation, allowing individuals to reintegrate into society more quickly.

Dos and Don'ts

When filling out the Prop 47 form, it is essential to follow the guidelines carefully. Below is a list of dos and don’ts to consider:

  • Do ensure that you provide accurate personal information, such as your name and contact details.
  • Don’t leave any sections of the form blank; incomplete forms may delay processing.
  • Do keep copies of all documents submitted for your records.
  • Don’t use unfamiliar terms or abbreviations; clarity is crucial in legal documentation.
  • Do consult with a legal professional if you have questions or need assistance.
  • Don’t rush through the form; take your time to ensure all information is correctly entered.

Misconceptions

Understanding Proposition 47 can be challenging due to various misconceptions. Here is a list of six common myths about the Prop 47 form, along with clarifications to help clear up confusion.

  1. Prop 47 only benefits drug offenders. Many believe that the measure exclusively supports those convicted of drug-related offenses. In reality, it also applies to certain property crimes, including petty theft and shoplifting, provided the amount involved is $950 or less.
  2. All felony convictions can be reduced under Prop 47. This is not the case. Not all felonies qualify for reduction. Offenders convicted of serious or violent crimes, such as murder or sex offenses, are excluded from seeking reclassification to misdemeanors.
  3. Once resentenced, offenders get a free pass. It’s a misconception that offenders can repeatedly apply for resentencing without restrictions. Courts have the discretion to deny requests if they believe the individual poses a public safety risk or has a history of severe crime.
  4. Prop 47 eliminates all jail time for offenders. Some think that the measure allows for an automatic release with no jail time. While it reduces penalties, it does not mean offenders will avoid consequences altogether. Misdemeanor sentences may still involve time in county jail, albeit for shorter durations compared to felonies.
  5. Prop 47 has no financial implications. Many fail to realize that the measure impacts state and local budgets significantly. It reallocates savings from reduced incarceration rates into community programs aimed at mental health and drug treatment, truancy prevention, and victim services.
  6. The implementation of Prop 47 is straightforward and immediate. People often believe that changes will take effect instantly. However, implementation involves a gradual process that includes court decisions and legislative adjustments, which may vary by region.

Addressing these misconceptions can help individuals understand the true implications of Proposition 47 and how it affects both the legal landscape and broader community resources.

Key takeaways

Here are some key takeaways regarding the Proposition 47 form and its implications:

  • Purpose of Proposition 47: This initiative aims to reduce felony sentences to misdemeanors for specific nonserious and nonviolent property and drug crimes.
  • Certain Offenses Covered: The law requires misdemeanor sentences instead of felony ones for specific drug possession crimes and crimes involving amounts of $950 or less, such as petty theft and receiving stolen property.
  • Previous Convictions Matter: Felony sentences can still be handed down if individuals have serious prior convictions—like rape or murder—or if they are registered sex offenders.
  • Resentencing Eligibility: Individuals currently serving felony sentences for offenses under this measure may apply for resentencing to a misdemeanor, with some exceptions based on their criminal history.
  • Savings Allocation: The savings produced by implementing this measure will support mental health programs, K-12 education, and victim services.
  • Impact on Jail Populations: An expected reduction in jail populations may occur as most offenders will be sentenced for shorter periods or face community supervision instead.
  • Long-term Financial Effects: The implementation of this measure could potentially save state and local governments hundreds of millions of dollars annually.
  • Community Funding: Funding from the initiative is set to be divided, with allocations for truancy prevention, victim services, and support for mental health and drug abuse treatment programs.
  • Wobbler Crimes Explained: Some crimes can be classified as either felonies or misdemeanors, known as 'wobblers'. This measure alters the standards for how these crimes are charged.
  • Procedural Changes: Courts might experience a temporary increase in workload due to resentencing but will likely see a reduction in processing time for misdemeanor cases overall.

Browse Other Templates

Fs-6100-13 - The AD 2001 aids in balancing personal needs with departmental operations.

How to Get Documents Notarized - It discusses common misconceptions about the role of a Notary Public.

Florida Notice of Commencement Form - Owner or lessee information, including name and address, is essential.